I`m humbled by your appreciation. I will spread the medal of on every shuttle and corvette that undocks with billions in cargo.
That would only affect the careless and clueless, everyone else would align (still tethered) then warp.
Exactly! Normal defenses will still be in place ā¦ like insta warp or align&warp.
I may add, based on my experience as a ganker, you canāt really gank someone unless they are careless or clueless.
WE HAVE FOUND THE NEW LEADER OF ANTIGANKING!!
WOOPEEEE!!!
From all the old threads to necro you choose this one? In any case, the āGeneral Discussionā forum is a better place to have a necro-any-old-thread contest.
WRONG!
Delaying CONCORD response or completely avoiding it. Committing a criminal act and delaying CONCORD response for an extended period of time.
If you pull CONCORD to location prior to actually ganking a target doing so would otherwise delay CONCORDās arrival to the illegal act of aggression from their central area of launching.
Therefore ganking in High Sec is an exploit because CONCORD is always pulled to a different location such as a gank in an asteroid belt far away from the gate that the actual gank is taking place at.
If saying so would make it true. Iām sure in your head it works like that but the reality is Iāve stated facts while you present wishful delusion. But anyway you are free to open a support ticket and ask from CCP if you want further proof.
Edit: Btw just so people donāt have to scroll up to see my other related post which you conveniently did not quote in your above postā¦
Your assumption is completely off, I am neither a ganker nor defend gankers. Also have no issue with them either, all part of the sandbox. Wherever this subject was brought up it was always stated that prolonging CONCORD response time (beyond its intended value) is the exploit, while pulling CONCORD off grid just resets the natural response time as when they are on grid their response time is shorter, thus it is not an exploit. Exploit is, just as the linked source material states, when someonā¦
Ooops. Did not notice the age, just had it visible in the bottom list.
And just in case a random innocent passerby does not know that most posts by DrysonBennington are false drivel, let me link to a GM post on Concord manipulation: http://eve-search.com/thread/352595-1/page/62#1857
Explain me why CCP disagree with you?
Dryson admitted to me in the AG channel he was a Dom alt.
It started off he wanted a clean break from the tards in the ganking world. When his AG solutions were not respected by his former Ganktard mates he just continued as a bad memeā¦
Dryson admitted to me in the AG channel he was a Dom alt.
No offense to Dryson, but Iād have to go really low to be that bad
Nice try Nitshie, Iām better than that
Yeah, Nitsche just admitted to me in private chat that he only posted that to get a rise out of you. Shame on him.
This topic was automatically closed 90 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.