Oh look, you don’t understand how individual experience is inadequate for understanding large-scale economies. Theory is all you have.
So now you’re talking about a miner, rather than manufacturer?
Originally I said “industry player”, you’re the one who assumed that meant manufacturing only.
It’s you repeatedly throwing a tantrum because you don’t like people engaging in PvE activity without feeding you kills.
Nope, and this is why you’re an idiot. I want fewer people engaging in industry/market PvP (which is not PvE) to die in combat PvP because more industry players are smart about how they play and use the available tools to protect themselves. I want more people to understand that EVE is a PvP game and play it that way, and fewer people who want a zero-risk AFK farming game where CCP gives them participation trophies and free ISK no matter how stupid they are.
You keep calling them “farmer trash” as if you insulting them makes them bad.
Nope. They’re already bad, labeling them “farmer trash” is simply an accurate description of what they are. They are pathetic whiny failures that need to GTFO and go back to WoW.
Ganking should have a risk element which requires effort and personal skill to mitigate.
How exactly do you make a 50v1 engagement have risk, especially when loss of the 50 ships is already guaranteed as soon as they activate their guns?
Why not? Other capital ships would stand up to 50-1 odds from glass cannon fit subcaps.
And those capital ships are not allowed in highsec. Fair trade though, freighters can have defenses like combat capital ships and be banned from highsec. But something tells me you don’t want this to happen.
