Moderation of the Forums

This threads still going and it’s over a month old, not bad for a thread where even the title is suggestive of breaking the rules.

Personally, I don’t see the point in this thread, the arguments are just likely to go around in circles.

1 Like

I troll to get interaction. :crazy_face: Like Foggy and I above. I don’t hate Foggy, I just agree sometimes and sometimes not. If you cant take the heat, get outta the kitchen. Like many of us trolls here, we post to instigate a response. Good or bad. If its good, the trolls pitch in to help. And as someone else pointed out, (sry, I forgot who) if it’s a whine/complaint, it gets squashed. Ask, don’t yell…

Don’t you mean you troll to get a reaction. That’s usually what trolls are after.

In the age of chaos, what else better is there to do? :rofl:

Here’s the thing. The trolls that make YOU laugh might not be the trolls that make ME laugh. The trolls that might be annoying to YOU might not be the trolls that are annoying to ME.

You want moderation that agrees with your narrative of who should and who should not be allowed to post. Not people whose narrative you disagree with. Just you. Everything you post is all about you.

No, Archer. There’s no room for subjective moderation. A rule for one is a rule for all. Period.

End of story.

2 Likes

Actually I look for good ideas that CCP will never use. That was till limiting recourses. That was in the forums before I ever heard anything from CCP on the matter. But I didnt follow the links enough back then and could have missed something. :wink:

And I forgot, I give a lot of isk to new players who post on the forums asking why I lost my stuff so they can restart as opposed to those who post with rage. They I give nothing, not even advice because they will never listen…

Edit; with another acct

Actually a hidden post can’t be read, unless the viewer wishes to read it. If the viewer doesn’t like the content then they shouldn’t have viewed it.

1 Like

I read all hidden posts. You just never know what pearls of wisdom you can find!

2 Likes

I tend to read some of them, on some rare occasions I do wonder why they were hidden.

2 Likes

Oh, Foggy… :heart:

Keep both classes of trolls, get rid of the objectively cancerous. End of story.

1 Like

Exactly, but those posting who oppose it do so because they would no longer be able to freely insult, demean, ridicule, flame, swear and attack others.

Establishing and following objective criteria (a “rubric”) for identifying and acting on cancerous posts/posters and permitting some degree of roughhousing are not mutually exclusive.

1 Like

This thread gets old fairly fast.

You’re right they should stick to the rules. This thread should be locked and any subsequent thread on this subject should also be locked.

2 Likes

Who’s holding the gun to your head and forcing you to read it?

I’m going to guess no one.

1 Like

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . how much?

Hmmm

I dont oppose it.

But I DO agree often with Nicky S.

I can see how that may not sit well with folk who measure others by keeping track of which posts a person likes when deciding how they feel about that person.

2 Likes

I can imagine scenarios where a person may think they’ve been insulted, demeaned and ridiculed because they can’t take criticism of a post.

New poster posts what they think is a truly brilliant idea only to be gently told that it’s an idea that’s come up before, been debated, had it’s flaws enumerated, and consigned to the trash.

Some people don’t react at all well to that and I am glad ISD and CCP give benefit of doubt.

1 Like

OK new forum alt, I’m not opposed to having all the forum rules enforced equally among all posters.

As for my past transgressions, I was heavily moderated for them while others who do it much more frequently aren’t.

I can imagine scenarios where some posters will say anything to keep the current status-quo. Doesn’t matter anyway, CCP clearly stated what’s expected from forum users.

Forum Rules:

The EVE forums are intended to provide a warm, friendly atmosphere for the EVE community.

To maintain order and a sense of community, all users should read and follow this policy. By using the EVE Online forums and participating in discussion there, users are affirming their willingness to comply with these terms.

This policy has been created to provide you with information about what you can expect as a forum user, what is expected of you, and to answer some questions relating to forum moderation that you may have during your use of the EVE Online forums.

Rules of Conduct

The following rules of conduct are to be followed when using the EVE Online forums. Breach of these rules will result in users being reprimanded as described in the policy below these rules.

1. Specifically restricted conduct.

The purpose of the EVE Online forums is to provide a platform for exchange of ideas, and a venue for the discussion of EVE Online. Occasionally there will be conflicts that arise when people voice opinions. Forum users are expected to be courteous when disagreeing with others.

In order to maintain an environment where everyone is welcome and discussion flows freely, certain types of conduct are prohibited on the EVE Online forums. These are:

  • Trolling
  • Flaming
  • Ranting
  • Personal Attacks
  • Harassment
  • Doxxing
  • Racism & Discrimination
  • Hate Speech
  • Sexism
  • Spamming
  • Bumping
  • Off-Topic Posting
  • Pyramid Quoting
  • Rumor Mongering
  • New Player Bashing
  • Impersonation
  • Advertising

2. Specifically restricted content.

EVE Online holds ESRB Teen and PEGI 12 ratings. All content posted to the EVE Online forums must be teen rated.

In addition to this, the EVE Online forums are not for discussion of real life current affairs, news, politics or religion. Discussion should revolve around EVE Online and its community.

For these reasons, specific content is prohibited on the EVE Online forums. These are:

  • Pornography
  • Profanity
  • Real Money Trading (RMT)
  • Discussion of Warnings & Bans
  • Discussion of Moderation
  • Private communications with CCP
  • In-Game Bugs & Exploits
  • Real World Religion
  • Real World Politics
  • Content that distorts the forum layout

3. Post constructively.

Negative feedback can be very useful to further improve EVE Online if it is presented in a civil and factual manner. All users are encouraged to honestly express their feelings regarding EVE Online and how it can be improved. Posts that are non-constructive, insulting or in breach of the rules will be deleted regardless of how valid the ideas behind them may be. Users are also reminded that posting with a lack of content also constitutes non-constructive posting.

2 Likes