No, it’s a feeling. I thought we established that already. The facts remain undiscussed.
I don’t know what you have established. I know what I think about multiboxing and have determined it for myself.
You can discuss them to your heart’s content. There’s only one fact I’m interested in, the fact that I think that multiboxing is cheating.
Of course it’s not a fact ,
I think it’s the word cheating that’s the problem , you use it as a fact when it’s just your opinion , my opinion is different from your so I say it’s not cheating.
Change it for another word , maybe I don’t like multiboxes .
Would be better for you rather than dictating what we have to call it
Except it isn’t. Cheating is circumventing or breaking the rules of a game, which are defined by the creator/host of said game and agreed on by the players when entering the game. Since CCP allows multiboxing, it cannot be cheating by definition. Your feeling of being cheated is completely irrelevant here. Repeating that nonsense claim doesn’t change that simple fact.
2 Likes
It is a fact that you think this.
It is also a fact that you are whining.
I’m sure it is. I’m not going to sugarcoat it, though.
Not at all, it is a fact that I think that multiboxing is cheating. It isn’t my fault they decided to engage in it, it still remains what it is.
You can say anything you like. It still doesn’t change anything for me.
No. That would mean it’s my problem and someone would be quick to point that.
Multiboxing is cheating and that’s a fact.
I think I know what’s best for me.
You canncall it anything you like.
I decide to call it cheating.
Just because it’s allowed it doesn’t mean it isn’t cheating.
There. Did that refresh your memory ?
Actually, by definition, that is the case.
You may wish to review the concept of how a game’s rules are defined. Hint: the rules are not made by you, and your opinion is irrelevant.
2 Likes
I know what I write and I know my mind. My mind tells me that multiboxing is cheating and I feel it is a fact.
And what’s wrong with agreeing to disagree with me, you all cannot do that? I have to think and feel exactly like you do? I don’t think so.
I don’t care what your “opinion” or your “feeling” is about 1 + 1 = 2, as long as the outcome isn’t exactly 2.
It’s been nice to discuss this all important issue with you all. I learned a few things. I feel that continuing the discussion with you would only rehash what’s been discussed and in the interest of the reader and the flow of the thread, it is best I move along.
I still think it’s cheating though.
See you all on the next important issue of the game!
I feel the Frostpacker clan should pay a tithe of 10 bil ISK a month to the Kherub Angels corporation. 
( @Felix_Frostpacker make it so based on @Whyatever 's convincing argument in this thread. 
)
2 Likes
To tell you the truth, it seems you have a problem with it , you insist on using the word cheating when it’s clearly not cheating as others have said . If you feel people are cheating report them to CCP .
I really think the only other thing you can contribute to this conversation would be silence , in an the wise interesting subject
[ 2019.08.13 22:15:28 ] Aiko Danuja > bot has no shame
[ 2019.08.13 22:15:50 ] Felix Frostpacker > no
1 Like
It’s ok to be irrational, just don’t expect anyone to take you seriously.
3 Likes
What is considered cheating is determined by CCP, who give discounts for having multiple accounts.
Usually fact’s adhere to logic.
1 Like
But where does your “cheating” even start and end then?
Let’s say i play a character on an account who wants to buy something in Amarr but is not sure if the price is the cheapest. So i log out of that character and i log into another character on the same account who is located in Jita. I check the price on the market and log back into the character in Amarr. There i make my market decision with information that this character cannot have by itself. Is it cheating?
Let’s reduce it to only one character on the account. I then open a third-party market information website to get the current prices in Jita. Is this then cheating by your definition?
If i used a second account to get the information, this surely is cheating by your definition. But why is it and not the others (possibly?)?
No it is not, that is just your opinion. You opinion is not a fact.
Clearly!
Even if you only use one character, but you benefit from miners who have more than one, than you are STILL cheating. This is why I only buy stuff from people who sign an affidavit that they produced the item ENTIRELY BY THEMSELVES.
2 Likes