Multiboxing Poll

Communications Center General Discussion
350

Multiboxing can be interpreted that way,
however, multi-client and multiboxing can be 2 different things,
which, when not described, and/or defined,
means that it is intended to be used to divert from the fact,
as an actual methods for ,
which goal of encryption is to keep the understanding and knowledge and practical use of communication or information to be unusable by other parties as intended to be used by other receivers.

In other words,
as he said,

"trivial and has no bearing on the poll.

Try to focus."

he literally means to encrypt the info against me,
as if I would not detect it and have to report it either to his superiors and/or other authorities,
especially if he did try to use such encryption and misinterpretation of meaning to be targeted at me or other officials.

–

Right,
however,
that does not exclude using multiclients,
or, multiple computers with multiple OS licenses,
and multiple EVE Online launchers clients loaded separately on both machines.

That also lets you log multiple Alpha accounts at the same,
even though it is equally or not more against the law,
and, also, if encrypted to do so,
against CCP’s intellectual property rights, and against their own corporate interest, not to say Trade Secret, while not omitting Trade Secret,
as equally circumvent security measures in place,
as misrepresented by the same answer, with the same way.

Also yes, 2 computers with 2 keyboards, and 2 mouse, can work to play multiclient, however, those multiple clients are also not on the same machine, with the same OS, with the same EVE Online Launcher.

The EVE Online Launcher also has a new feature for this which does include multiple account names and login data (credentials, not
trivial and has no bearing on the sequence or heuristics.

Try to focus.), and is designed to let you log in multiple EVE Online clients on the same computer.

When using 2 launchers on 2 or more machines,
you don’t need that ,
because it does no count,
except that it counts against the circumvention of the circumvention.

–

You can have 3 computers and run 3 Alpha Accounts, although, illegally.
Additionally, EVE Online would find out.

Furthermore, since you didn’t mean the multiboxing to be on different computers,
then, yes, it is about multiclient,
regardless of multiboxing or not,
and yes, while it is representing as not counting,
does, and yes, due to CCP’s IP (Intellectual Property, let me spell out since you don’t know, can’t know, and I know why you shouldn’t, since I am investigating why), is counting, and it is counting it.

–
2. - 11 minutes later at 19:21 Fri Mar 26, 2021:
Oh, guess what,
the new multiple accounts feature from the launcher was introduced around when they implemented the new Alpha Clone perspective system,
which would allow Omega pilots to log more than one account at the same time,
and,
was (and is still currently) designed to make it impossible to log multiple Alpha clones accounts,
which Alpha Clones also used to mean something else before a well.

It does so by informing the users attempting to do with a nice information message to confirm that they can only have 1 such data of an Alpha Clone logged in at a time,
even if they are more superior,
attempt to be more superior,
or don’t even know what superior means,
because everyone else around them that ever used that word or did that meaning always did it in ways which were not optimal,
and they tried to give it an umbrella of meaning of terms which is intended to be all encapsulating…

Well, yes, they do, however,
a little better and more efficient self-control for that superiority and the proper interpretation of it goes a long way,
it’s also good to have description to confirm what the meaning of terms used as about,
and,
if they are intended to be used to make other terms to be irrelevant,
then , or, during the fact, or before,
explain why and so on, or, fix it after then, as now.

Btw,

has been around for some time, if not before me.
It is listed as 2015 and 2017, but I am pretty sure he was around before 2012.

351

I’m not sure what you’re getting at because it seems way off topic. I gave you the interpretation of multiboxing as it relates to the questions the OP asked so you could answer the questions if you wanted to. If you are seeking feedback on some other interpretation or with respect to legal concerns, then you should start a new thread with a poll containing the questions you want people to give you feedback on.

1 Like
352

Okay. I’m not exactly sure what’s going on here. But I can assure you that I didn’t intend to mislead anyone. I’m a native English speaker, and I’ve only ever heard multiboxing used to describe the act of one person playing several clients at once. If it has any other meanings in English, or any other languages, I am unaware of them. So, if you find the poling questions to be confusing or misleading, it was because they were made by a random schmuck who gave them about 15 minutes thought, and not because some evil genius set out to manipulate his participants into giving him the answers he wanted.

Hanlon’s razor- never attribute to malice, that which can be adequately explained by stupidity.

Does this answer address your concerns?
  • Yes
  • No, and I smell like limburger cheese

0 voters

2 Likes
353

That I know of it’s only confusing because of historical context. You know how English is. The world changes around it. In olden days computers weren’t powerful enough to run more than one copy of a game at a time with acceptable performance so a second box was all but necessary. That’s why we called it ‘multiboxing’. These days the way you do it is all nice and streamlined, but the antiquated term still remains because almost everyone familiar with the gaming genre it applies to already knows what it means.

1 Like
354

I gotta answer this one day. In the meantime, I want to see if anyone makes a good case one way or the other just so I can post the reasons. It’s a 2 edged sword and I want to see if anyone can “change my mind”. :wink:

355

Obviously no, but if you try to, you are trying to , it doesn’t make it any more right.
There are also a lot of criminal assassinating language by trying to make communication seem to be other than intended.

—

How could you not be aware of it unless you, yourself, don’t want to be aware of it, whether from language, communication using language or other of report of communication, when you’re deliberately informed of it, about it, given the reasons why and source of including how the information is being misused which you also prefer vote for?

—
Seems to me that application for security work whether in other language or systems about this language and system which seems intended to be use as tool of attack for , multi boxing,

It does look like something else you don’t, even if the genius level that was good was intended to be made to look evil, which it may not be.

Nonetheless,
you can multi box with many clients per box.
If you chose to ignore that multiclient can be done in one box by meaning that multibox is multiclient on one box and make it seem like if it isn’t is not something I would associate with for accounts security no.

You also try to make my post irrelevant in electronic warfare, so yes, I’m in courts against that, whatever languages you know if not.

—
As a matter of fact they offer me police work for research about this kind of electronic warfare not to say cyber-attacks.

Maybe the reason you don’t know is you get paid not to know or the attacks you claim are not existing makes you unable to be.

356

Oh, lol, for a second I thought you were making serious responses.

357

Well, not really. I love the game, so I like spending time in the game, not the forums. I also avoid SISI, but I’ve found it to be a good place to test for new things and fits. On the poll part, I see where you could get that, but I have never tried to even use my alts on this account to look on the forums.

As it has been said, multiboxing makes you less efficient at things. I started multiboxing so I could boost my mining ship and mine more efficiently. And when ppl talk about isk/hour in reality for multiboxers should be isk/hour split by account, then the number is not that amazing.

When you can join a fleet with boosters, then you dont need one for yourself.

Multiboxing has its perks but also its disadvantages.

360

The problem with your poll is Aged Brick is better… just sayin :stuck_out_tongue_winking_eye:

1 Like
362

I understand where you’re coming from, but just in case it takes some of the edge off I want to tell you that I appreciate your sincerely trying to help people in the way you believe is best.

364

Sigh. I don’t know. Maybe I misinterpreted what he was trying to say, but I don’t really feel like going back and trying to puzzle it out. Regardless, thanks for your response.

374

Removed some off-topic posting

1 Like
375

Do MultiBoxers get to MultiVote?

376

Ah well,
thank you,
at least it gives me more intelligence against the perpetrators to gain more benefit from surprise even though I shouldn’t need it in the circumstances due to the level of blatancy.

Phishing is a cybercrime in which a target or targets are contacted by email, telephone or text message by someone posing as a legitimate institution to lure individuals into providing sensitive data such as personally identifiable information, banking and credit card details, and passwords.

### What Is Phishing? - Phishing
www.phishing.org › what-is-phishing

–
Noun. 1. blatancy - the property of being both obvious and offensive; “the blatancy of his attempt to whitewash the crime was unforgivable” noticeability, noticeableness, obviousness, patency - the property of being easy to see and understand. odiousness, offensiveness, distastefulness - the quality of being offensive.

### Blatancy - definition of blatancy by The Free Dictionary
noun

  1. a solution of lime and water or of whiting, size, and water, used for painting walls white.
    image image
  2. a deliberate concealment of someone’s mistakes or faults in order to clear their name.
    “the opposition called the report “a whitewash””

verb

  1. paint (a wall, building, or room) with whitewash.
    “the brick walls have been whitewashed”

  2. deliberately attempt to conceal unpleasant or incriminating facts about (someone or something).
    “most sources prefer to ignore or whitewash the most disturbing aspect of such reports”

Similar: _ cover up , sweep under the carpet , hush up , suppress

377

Again, this is not pertinent to the discussion.

Please quit trying to continuously and purposely derail this civil discussion.

–Focused Gadget

378

The reason it is pertinent is due to the new Alpha Clone.

The reason it is pertinent due to the new Alpha Clone is because those were introduced after multiboxing…

The reason I didn’t try to continuously and purposely derail this civil discussion, including the civilization level of the discussion,
which discussion, if you read, in the definition, is gossip,
is because that ,
1st,
I didn’t start to derail this thread or other,
despite other attempts to do so and gossip about it.
2nd,
I didn’t purposely try to derail this thread either.
In fact, I do register copyright of how other like you try to misinterpret me with such gossip.
I do not only register copyright of how others do so,
but I also register copyright of how I do not,
and I also organize those facts in inventory,
which I also have evidence from the courts that they want me to report it to military.

Of course if you or others attacked my wife with such gossip and lies about me,
with the only intent to discredit me, to credit yourself for gossip,
I would have to protect myself and my family for the enmities if not hatred towards me you develop, seek to, and, across multiple instances,
during multiple subjects,
and, against the same inventory systems,
including electronic data transaction systems,
which data transactions systems are used for the input of those forums content,
as well as the loading of the system too.

–
Furthermore,
the reason the Alpha Clone were introduced was due to gossip,
which,
by then,
had reached level higher than before,
and,
could use new systems from the Alpha Clones,
to allow new players to play.

Now, there is the new Expertise System,
which, funny enough, my company name is :
Informatik Systems & Expertise Corp.

So yes, even more pertinent than you tried to make it seem not pertinent,
and, also, even more pertinent than you tried to make your post seem pertinent.

Also, why are you trying to make me seem like if I derail the thread by not including how you try to make me seem like if I derail the thread,
but,
also ,
want to me to get the credit from your intent to make me seem like if intend to derail the thread,
when I did not, would not, will not, and don’t.?

It’s not like if I would have any use to associate with that,
or that you are not trying to get me by association…

To include the level of civilization omits the higher level of civilization from the army which is also required to relate to it and join it.

379

–

the property of being both obvious and offensive

Obviously offensive towards me.

pa·ten·cy

/ˈpatnsē,ˈpātnsē/

noun

MEDICINE

  1. the condition of being open, expanded, or unobstructed.
    “the procedure was successful in restoring the patency of the fallopian tubes”
  • the condition of showing detectable parasite infection.
    “a complication, once patency is established in the ■■■■■, is contamination of the environment with eggs”

You just like to spread this kind of propaganda against me and not just on these forums I found out, for the security of my family as well.

Like try to make clear and obstructed path to investing in those propaganda being expended against me,
in patency against my work to seek to credit yourself to discredit again, by seeking to justify communication gap,
again, seeking to encrypt behavior and actions sought against me,
again, trying to make it seem as if communication about it is harassment,
when it is not,
since the attacks against me are even worse than harassing me,
and seeking to hold me responsible for the communication gap,
which communication gap is sought by encryption and forfeiture,
and also is not as possibly civil as represented to be.

It’s like you tried to attack communication to gain a strategic advantage over it,
but,
misrepresent peaceful communication and behavior as if it was not ,
while seeking to misrepresent your behavior towards me like if it was,
when it isn’t since both the courts and police and the army and the governors and the attorney generals each confirmed to me you were not and we are in courts about why and how it is done.

Not only you btw.
If you tried to credit yourself for the attacks,
you would also divert from the facts and seek to tamper with evidence.

–
Not to be read:
Pansy.

It has to do with how you try to control my behavior,
and seek to omit how you try to control my behavior.
I could not and would not do 1% of the things you say I do,
when I do not,
and when I would not,
even while you tried to pay me.

380

We don’t know what you’re on about. Once you delve into multiboxing alpha accounts and violations of the EULA, I don’t think a single soul posting in this topic will support that, nor does anyone here support outright criminal activity. We are just talking about the legal practice of logging in with multiple omega accounts at the same time.

381

@Qia_Kare

Apparently our boy is a half bubble off plum. But, he’s not hurting anyone, and I don’t think arguing is going to help anything. I don’t know. I wish I could help, but I don’t know how. So, I just assume let him do his thing and not antagonize him.

1 Like
382

Regardless, it’s better for me to make a separate thread due to their gaslighting intent to marginalized me.

I could just ask staff to block them as they do to nowhere , in blatant communication warfare, and interference of the detection system and sought forfeiture of how they cover up evidence.

—
I have no use to talk to them except about their attacks and intent to destroy,

Their misrepresentation of civilized is also offensive.

—
It’s for their same attacks reason they won’t have any use for me and neither will I as they are not likable, nor friendly in their civilized war.