Nothing of that is new. These belt haulers have been in EVE for ages and they have been dropping tons of minerals for ages. What’s the fuzz about? It’s actually quite astonishing that @CCP_Aurora doesn’t know about this. What’s worse? These old hauler spawns have better income potential than the much harder to deal with diamond rats. So much for awesome.
The Enyo had that DPS before as well and all you have to break are the haulers not the accompanying BS. Funny thing that you mention “solo”, though. I wasn’t aware that “solo” is a thing now.
Btw the Enyo could not have won that fight to secure passage for the Kyros pre buff.
yes the Enyo could do that pre-buff, but not with a viable PvP tackle fit…at which point, why use an Enyo for ratting if you can’t respond to fleet comms.
Try to think a little deeper.
You can:
PvP and fulfill your tackle role.
PvE and make 10-20mil per tick, without having to dock and change ship/mods.
Well, firstly, I find it quite astounding how happy you are about a frigate that can create as much ISK as a Cruiser. Last I heard, CCP is worried about the incoming amount of ISK. So, this Enyo is out of balance. Nothing new here, of course.
Secondly, I fail to see how an active armor enyo has any issues dealing with these rats and work as tackle in a fleet. Even a shield buffer enyo works just fine if you want more DPS. Rouge Drones are notoriously bad at hitting fast moving ships.
You had to fit mag stabs and neutrons to kill the rats +heat before reload + fitting rigs.
Now you can fit normal armor tanking mods + ions and kill the rats, no heat. Dps rigs, only 1 mag stab + tank
Also with shield buffer you won’t have proper tackle mods.
You can probably now dual prop as well (scram only) with electrons and 2 mag stabs + dps rigs, and still kill the rats. There’s A LOT of options available now that allow you to belt rat in a PvP viable fit.
The Enyo also has to manually pilot into blaster range of every ship, greatly reducing the ISK/hour.
It’s not a ship I would chosoe to rat in (for the sake of ratting). But it’s the one I choose when my standing fleet needs small tackle on standby.\
Also I have to be very active to push 18mil/tick (average). It’s usually 11 mil/tick if I get up and make coffee/real life stuff/etc. Active also means careful use of ancillary armor rep, ADCU and heat, so I’m not wasting time docking up to repair. 18mil/tick requires maximum attention.
what’s even more disgusting is the lack of awareness from CCP that null sec npc haulers have always made actual mining redundant to the eve economy. The amount of basic minerals is jawdropping for the amount of risk involved.
CCP’s solution? oh let’s make rorquals able to effectively solo mine. rollseyes
“oh look, cute enyo!” ~whoosh
you folks have to realize that this is the one thing that’ll go under the radar for CCP’s “shortage” phase, and the nullbears are laffing all the way to the virtual bank.
NPC haulers don’t add ISK to the economy, just materials that get rapidly consumed. It’s not an ISK faucet.
Same for officer mods. If anything the nps haulers are sinks (taxes/etc).
An enyo also can’t loot those minerals. There’s also very high risk of enemy corps (goons) swarming it to stop us (horde) from looting it. Especially in the 1S- system.
Reds were on the way (spais!) as we scrambled to loot it. We had two hictors go out and bubble the in-gates.
This is not a thing to get worked up about. For someone flying solo it’s quite a gift, followed by a number of trips back and forth to pick it all up, putting ships and loot at risk. But to the overall economy, a mineral dump to a lucky player is not unbalancing, because its rare. A group of mining ships can hoover up EVERYTHING, continuously.