Off-Topic Thread vol. 2

This is exactly what I was referring too. I was sharing my views and experiences living in the Federation. Why it didn’t work for me. The self discovery process that the State is a better fit for me personally. And it’s been derailed into a “hand-slapping, you should convey it my way because it’s better” load of nonsense.

  1. I’m not a diplomat.
  2. you’re making a huge assumption that you know exactly how I portray the State in my inter-personal communication with an individual. And let’s face it. Public communication is vastly different.
    I assure you that when I’m in a one on one personal conversation with someone I don’t “soften” the State for them.
  3. these kinds of derailing conversations are boring. It bores me. It serves absolutely no purpose except to grandstand. And I have no interest in such things.

You do you. I’ll do me.


1 Like

I think—and I could be totally wrong here—that Aria’s ‘It’s the Off-Topic thread’ was more meant as ‘don’t worry, you can’t derail the conversation here’.


I like Gallente people because they are usually quite open minded and interested in novel experiences.

Sue me.


I would, but Scooter McCabe doesn’t do Space Court anymore.

I Love You Arrendis!!!

True or false: The Amarr mandate to bring all of humanity into union under God means that the Caldari must, eventually, come under the dominion of the Throne?


What is a loaded question? How might one give the impression of honest discourse while not actually interested at all in allowing it.

Thank you Arrendis for your outstanding question, also for providing two options for answers as I am a simple warmonger that would have had a hard time if say, I were presented with four possible answers.

I pick True.

P.S. Whats also cool, is I got a fifty percent chance of being correct!

By giving an answer like yours, obviously.

Then please, show other options. Either the mandate for the Reclaiming eventually has to apply to the Caldari, or it doesn’t.

Thank you again Arrendis for once again making the discussion easy for me and the audience to follow! You have cleverly and clearly broken down the entirety of politics between the empires over thousands of years into two possible options for me to choose.

Option 1 - The mandate for the Reclaiming eventually has to apply to the Caldari.

Option 2 - The mandate for the Reclaiming does not eventually have to apply to the Caldari.

I choose, uhm, Option 1! Gosh ain’t this great that everything is so black and white! Its like doing math!

And you have yet to show another option.

Hrm, try another true and false, I am good at true and false.

You know, when you start off with claims that my statements are

and then cast them as

but can’t actually offer a substantive response, you kind of draw attention to your own evasions and obfuscation.

So… got anything substantive on the issue of the Empire’s long-term intentions vis-a-vis controlling the Caldari, or just more smoke and whining?


You give this pedant too much credit by taking notice, Shakiel.


Mmh. Well, she does have a point, sir, but it’s not quite the one she thinks she has. Arrendis has a habit of looking at things in binary terms (“either it’s this or that”); ambiguity isn’t really her thing.

It’s very much mine, though.

The Imperial Rite does carry the requirement of seeking to reunite humanity in God’s service. This has traditionally been done through straightforward conquest, but that method got its wings clipped pretty sharply when the Amarr tried it on the Jove (Vak’Atioth).

While it’s popular (and in certain cases accurate) to question their motives, to the Amarr as a culture and faith this is a form of rescue: every soul, friend or foe, that remains outside the Rite through death is, quite simply, doomed, though whether to simple destruction or to some unpleasant afterlife seems to be a matter of a little debate. As a result, as a matter of simple mercy the Reclaiming should proceed as swiftly as it practically can … but the practicalities have gotten really sticky since the Empire found itself with peers.

Unable to simply roll over all opposition, the Empire’s been forced to learn pragmatism. (Though of course there’s always going to be someone spoiling for a fight. “Come on! We can take 'em!”)

The Imperial Rite, then, has actually a lot in common with the Federal notion of “human rights”: each empire has something to offer, something precious to offer all humanity (inherent rights recognized / grace of God recovered). But, “must” has met “can’t,” and what won’t work cannot be the correct path.

So basically Arrendis is just pointing out the obvious: the Empire is an outward-facing power seeking to spread its dominion and ideals. She talks about this as though it should make the State more suspicious of the Empire, but in practice the State has already taken measures to counter it (more rigidly than either the Republic or the Federation, in fact), since Amarrian religious practices are banned except for Khanid Kingdom expatriates (and even then it’s to be practiced only in private).

Yes, like the Gallente, they want to rescue us from ourselves. So what? We knew that already.

If I remember her angle correctly, Arrendis is one who feels the Caldari and Matari should make common cause, each nation abandoning its association with the Empire and Federation, respectively, and forming a third power block to resist all expansionist aggression from any quarter. My sense is that this is unworkable precisely because of what each people has in common: a lack of concern for outsiders and a lasting historic grudge against different outward-facing powers.

The Republic isn’t going to go to war with the Federation for a bunch of outsiders. Neither is the State going to “come for” anybody else’s people.

As it stands, each side’s more outward-facing “partner” has some not-so-quiet ulterior motives in the arrangement, but that’s neither a surprise nor much of a problem. The Amarr aren’t going to try an armed Reclaiming in the State any more than the Federation’s going to invade the Republic to impose democracy and ban voluval rituals, and both the Republic and State are well-prepared to fend off cultural attempts by their respective partners to influence them.

It’s maybe reason for a bit of inter-empire wariness but what else is new.

In other words Arrendis is pointing out that Triglavians like blue stars. The appropriate answer is something along the lines of, “Yes, we know that, thanks.”


As a point it is worth discussing. As an argument it is childish.

It is true - and also tautological. It is tedious because it requires far more ink to point out the sleight of hand in her conclusion than it does to write. Only an idiot could consider it a proof, and to argue with a fool is debasing.

1 Like

Except, of course, that I’m not the one who pointed it out. That was Amicia. All I did was essentially say ‘hey, you noticed!’ to Remilia, and then mock the twit who attempted to obfuscate it.

1 Like

I’ve never heard it put forth that the Gallente want to rescue you from yourselves. Generally we Gallente are perfectly fine with you living the way you choose to live and identifying however you want to identify as long as you aren’t infringing on the human rights and dignity of others in the process.

The notion of ‘imposing democracy’ is a bit oxymoronic, isn’t it? The idea that forcing someone to accept a form of governance they themselves haven’t chosen is anti-democratic from the outset. The Federation imposes democracy only so far as anyone wishing to join the Federation, a democratic union by design, must also adopt democracy. We don’t generally invade other territories by force and demand they submit to democracy.

Also, I won’t pretend to understand the Voluval but given that the Jin-Mei maintain a social caste system within the Federation, I’m not certain the Federation would ever plan to ban the practice.

Yeah, congratulations, that whole ‘human rights’ thing? That’s the Gallente trying to change everyone else.

If the Federation doesn’t invade other territories, why are State systems in the warzone?

But then, the whole point ignores the fact that the Federation did export parliamentary democracy to the Republic when it was formed. Just because the Federation uses soft power and cultural corrosion to expand its power and, as Aria puts it, ‘rescue us from ourselves’, rather than golden fleets and enslavement, doesn’t mean you’re not doing it.


Oh! So you are not the one that formulated the opinion, you were merely defending it!