I, too, like to start my day with a hearty breakfast and some extremely normal vid of an extrajudicial execution by unmarked, masked soldiers.
Careful not to cut yourself on all that edge.
I, too, like to start my day with a hearty breakfast and some extremely normal vid of an extrajudicial execution by unmarked, masked soldiers.
Careful not to cut yourself on all that edge.
Lady Cerra goes on her little rant about âHarkonâs horrific schemesâ and then points out this guy among the refugees as part of it. As a sleeper agent. Sleeper agents donât activate and then go trying to infiltrate groups. Sleeper agents infiltrate months or years ahead of time, and wait until activated. Thatâs what makes them sleeper agents.
Really? Letâs take another look!
Sooo⌠Iâm conflating these to be one thing, am I? If theyâre not already connected, what is House Sarum alleging those Minmatar terrorists are responsible for? Oh, WAIT! I KNOW. House Sarum is alleging Minmatar terrorists are responsible people who clean up their own messes and make sure all of their committments are met! Thatâs it, right?
I, too, like to start my day with a hearty breakfast and the pseudo-pedantic rantings of a lonely soul who will punch down at anything in sight.
Yes, and Iâm certain thatâs exactly the definition Lady Shalee Lianne had in mind when she wrote her post, because she was accessing the Culome Dictionary of Pedantry while she wrote it.
We all know that, had it been in your best interest, you would have pointed out that the second bullet point does not clarify what it is that House Sarum is alleging the âMinmatar Terroristsâ are responsible for, because there is no object attached to the word âresponsibleâ or whatever the grammar rules are. But it wasnât in your favor this time, so you skipped it.
Not to mention that the main point of my argument is that
Even if your claim that Sarum is blaming them is correct, 1) their accusation has almost nothing to do with this topic, and 2) your source is a news outlet that recently claimed Sarum had put Zashev at the head of a Reclaiming fleet, and then had to retract that claim.
(Not only that, but your basis for this blame is that the two bullet points are right beside each other. Not had your coffee yet?)
What remains is that House Cerra has not blamed UâK for the Deathglow attack, and neither have I. Our concern is the operative that was found among the Moisant refugees. Those are two distinct and separate occurrences.
And pray, what other conditions would warrant âsleeper agentâ rather than âagentâ? Honestly, are you really reduced to âwords donât mean thingsâ?
Actually, looking at the rest of your reply, yes, that appears to be exactly what youâre reduced to. Have fun with Blackwhatever Intrathingy, I guess.
Pilot Quatrevaux for someone who seems to be nominally on the side of the Matari you sure are carrying a lot of water for an Amarrian (no matter if this slaver is reformed or not).
âWe bring death!â say one group of capsuleers.
âWe bring a different kind of death !â say a different group of capsuleers.
Yes. Well. Quite.
The Amarrian in question is housing a few thousand of my kin.
Well evidence points to the whoever made the attack had access to Imperial Armaments chem rockets, but that could be Omirites, or Khanid, or Sarum false flag. Until the munition is traced any further speculation on that is fruitless.
Absolutely barbaric.
And here I thought you to be a woman of practicality. Fascinating
This topic was automatically closed 90 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.