For the sake of this reply, I’m gong to assume that our discussion on this topic began here. We had exchanged a few comments prior to that, but they were along a different line of reasoning.
You’ll see in that post that I was refuting someone else’s claim, specifically a claim that Orcas and Rorquals are balanced because many other ships share a large number of roles and/or bonuses.
You’ll also see that I provided rationale backing up said refutations. I met my burden of proof at that point.
You disagreed with my rationale, which you are well and good to do and would normally shift the burden of proof back onto me, but you did so without providing any rationale of your own other than simply dismissing mine.
Ergo, burden of proof is currently on you.
I stand by my point. You would be well served by better articulating why you feel the Orca and Rorqual are well balanced as-is instead of simply stating it as a matter of fact. Even if the burden of proof was on me, clearly articulating your stance is always a more compelling and satisfying argument that relying on pedantry.