Proposal for Rebalancing of the Suicide Gank

[Io_Koval]

My growing updated response to show just how thick this conversation is getting:

@Lucas_Kell

Again though, what you’re reminding us is that an unrelated statement was made by a GM.

Objectively incorrect. I am quoting a CCP employee, twice. How you fail to be objective, is for your reflection.

@Lucas_Kell

CCP looking at reducing ganking mechanics does not mean they will be changing EULA definitions. You’re conflating two separate things

No one is talking about ganking mechanics here. You and I both are talking about policy. Come read the content of your own original question where you talk about the behavior relating to the EULA – a matter of policy not game mechanics (the latter of which is governed by rules around exploits – neither of us are discussing this):

@Lucas_Kell

Ask him though. @CCP_Rattati, in the following slide, when you labelled some highsec PvP as griefing, were you only talking about behaviour that is currently against the EULA, or were you talking about a subset of highsec PvP that is currently allowed within the EULA?

Is answered by the following CCP employee post-fanfest about POLICY:

@CCP_Swift

To be abundantly clear: there has been no policy change for ganking

@CCP_Swift

Asymmetric PvP, as well as ganking, is still allowed in EVE.

I look forward to debunking your further squirming out of this one. Somehow you cannot say “thanks, I stand corrected” and let everyone leave it at that.