Proposal for Rebalancing of the Suicide Gank

Which is why its an excellent counterplay to ganking.

2 Likes

I find people who say learning how to avoid isn’t countering, basically don’t want to go thru the trouble of learning how :smiley:

2 Likes

I think it can be argued that thinking is, by its nature, active. In the chess analogy a person who’s reliant on whatever passive options they have have either already made a series of poor moves or their opponent has already made a series of excellent moves. That there’s nothing a player about to lose a game of chess can do to avoid their impending loss does not excuse all the moves that led up to that moment from consideration.

Whether CCP changes Eve or not will rest on just how strongly they believe that the current crop of players have lost the resilience necessary to ward off the emotional hurt of losing a ship in a PvP game unexpectedly.

I have, in my time, suffered numerous losses. Some of which were embarrassingly stupid of me and easily avoidable had I been smarter at the time. I considered that to be part of the experience I signed up for. I have to wonder if people have grown too fragile for that. If they haven’t, then I see nothing wrong with players, however new, losing a ship once they’ve learned to pilot it out of the starter systems. If the corvette is so weak as to be non-viable as a newbie safety net, then buff that and let the new players be happy they get free ships for life no matter how many mistakes they make.

Noooo ! You’ve just made sure that long after the heat death of the entire universe…aeons after the last black hole has evaporated from Hawking radiation…this thread will be the last active thing in the entire universe as the very last microjoules of energy are used to type ‘Nope’ on a thread with 10^163 posts.

1 Like

Just needs to be 5 characters typed, not 5 showing.

no would actually bypass the 5 char rule

No  

1 Like

NO!

1 Like

Amazing this topic convo even covers the debate on forum reply characters used to gank vs antigank

1 Like

4 Likes

Some might say, one of your most insightful posts ever :slight_smile: j/k

Clever approach.

Hey…I’m now officially a psychopathic seal clubber…

Maverickz was thinking of you all the way through…

1 Like

You realize you can’t gank a barge with just one cata right?

Huh.

It’s almost like you don’t play the game :smiley:

2 Likes

If that had been my barge I’d have had damage control in low slot. Also, at 10 weeks the player ought to be onto T2 shields, armour, etc. But then Lucas ignores the fact that tank and avoidance measures are the best form of AG. That barge really oughtn’t to have been zapped by 4 Catalysts.

1 Like

I’ve tried to gank a barge in a solo cata. Not enough DPS unless really crappy fit or you get lucky.

Nah bruv, we know you thought the barge could be ganked solo :smiley:

Who said I’ve quit ganking? You realize this is EVE right bruv?

I’m a miner/ratter/pirate/ganker/industrial baron/general knave/helper of nubs/abyss runner/mission runner/sometimeswheni’mboredievendohaulermissionsfortheluz :smiley:

You realize you trynna push this narrative of only one playstyle makes you look quite daft right?

Shrug :smiley:

Whatever you gotta tell yourself bruv.

We’re the only friends you have :smiley:

Yet another genius fitting for max yield and losing 60 million in 5 seconds, more than negating any profit made from mining. Zkill is full of such idiocy every single day…

And I just noticed they are using T2 strip miners with no crystals, making them all but useless. That player didn’t even need to be in a barge in the first place…

2 Likes

The bro can’t even fit crystals.

Pretty sure he ain’t raking in the ISK :smiley:

1 Like

Pretty sure I’d rather fit for max tank, pay attention, watch local, and not lose any ISK. Period.

3 Likes

Esp now with Higgs its even easier.

Honestly, people with mine solo in low with barges should charge high sec people to learn how LOL.