Short, terse responses. Usually indicates that one is trying to elicit a response from someone else but can’t really think of anything to say.
To someone else. You specifically felt in necessary to bring it BACK up and make it your point. So, my initial evaluation seems correct.
No, it shows that you are an idiot.
You say “I am not in the sky, therefore I would not want to fly”. That’s just stupid. You are not in the sky, because you can’t fly. Does not say anything about if you could fly.
No. That would be actually completely illogical. you go from “just because you can’t, does not mean that you would not like it” to “just because you can’t, means you would like it”. This makes no logical sense, again.
Because you wrote so much BS that its seems you have an issue with reality.
It’s a free forum. You are actually the Narcissist here “claiming” to be a psychiatris with an at least 6 figure salary. So ■■■■■■■ what. I don’t give a ■■■■ about what anybody makes, especially not a loud mouth on a ■■■■■■■ gaming forum. Here and in EvE you can be whatever you want to be. If you want to be the psychiatrist here, go head. Just don’t expect anybody to believe your garbage claims at face value.
I was stating facts, not boasts. Money means very little to me, to be honest, as does status.
But I can clearly see I got under your skin. You shouldn’t take things so seriously.
And I’m done. You can continue arguing among yourselves. Don’t be so serious, peeps. You’ll end up needing me in the real world.
Hahahahaha … you haven’t been here long have you. Have fun stating “facts”. You should have a talk with Andersen about that. She is especialy well “schooled” about facts.
Bla bla bla … blablabla … blaaaaaaaaaaaa. BUT BLA!
Stop this guys. The whole thread can be cancelled.
Been here since '03, pup. Don’t see that changing anytime soon.
If you really are a psychiatrist, you better stay away from this forum, it will make you feel like you are in work or something. 
No joke! It really does.
Not with a rorqual. Therefore your sentence is stupid.
NO.
You said you don’t fly in HS, SO you don’t want to fly a rorqual in HS. Which is stupid, as in it makes no logical sense.
No. I decided that from the fact that you are denying reality.
I’m guessing that’s in the universe as a whole and not this game that went live in 2003? Unless you have a time machine, in which case I apologize and we should be friends because you have a time machine.
Good for you … then you should know by now how things work at the forums.
June 3rd, 2003 on my main. You really do have problems, my friend.
That’s by your lack of logic. Which proves, again, that you are an idiot.
And that’s not what I wrote.I wrote, it does not prevent you from. I did not wrote, it makes you. You are making the two terms have same meaning, while they don’t.
But it still does not mean that you would not fly in HS if that ship was available in HS.
No they don’t. Provide evidence or stop lying.
For example imagine if enough rorqs got together to rep-break concords damage rates.
Really big problem.
Once again you demonstrate your ignorance of game mechanics. CONCORD damage can not be tanked, it’s literally impossible. And even if you somehow did you’d just get mass-banned for abusing an exploit. Nobody is going to do this.
But, it still does not mean that you would not fly in HS if that ship was added to HS. It does not PREVENT, so when you says “so I would not” it makes no sense.
You don’t live in the sky, does not mean that if you could fly you would not.
Is that from your “knowledge” on the volume of ore available in NS and HS ?
and as I said, it does not mean that you would not be a HS pilot if rorquals were added to HS.