A dishonest poster, whom issues posts just to create conflict and drama for their own amusement, sometimes also to derail topics away from their own sensitive/advantageous interests.
What is your definition?
A dishonest poster, whom issues posts just to create conflict and drama for their own amusement, sometimes also to derail topics away from their own sensitive/advantageous interests.
What is your definition?
Short of anything damning that will cause CCP to exclude him, he can probably run. No one here believes he can win. He keeps talking about this mythical movement of supporters that are on the way.
Then why are you here?
I canāt believe I actually get to say thisā¦ for the lulz.
AKA: Trolling.
No. Any and all responses will be civil and reasoned. Iām getting a lot of enjoyment from everyone elses responses.
āit is a lie, which it is, is notā
I wish signatures still existed
CCP can make up any rules they want. I suspect he might already be disqualified for having been forum banned too many times. Also thereās the plethora of locked threads and controversial bigoted statements. If none of that is covered by the rules, CCP can change the rules.
I didnāt know for certain of any bans and I havenāt been through all of his threads, so I couldnāt say.
Yes.
āFor teh lulzā is trolling, defacto.
Selective quotingā¦par for the course.
Troll.
A person who makes a deliberately offensive or provocative online post.
Trolling
The act of making deliberately offensive or provocative posts online.
Your OP is provocative in nature, and could fall under the term trolling; which as stated before is a purely subjective matter.
Your definition is somewhat dishonest, as you appear to consider people that have opinions differing from your own to be trolls.
Ermā¦ Fairyland doesnāt count as an international location.
Selective responses
I canāt believe I actually get to say thisā¦ for the lulz.
Nothing selective about that.
Finallyā¦quoting the full response. Before, it was just āNo.ā
What if it was the other way around though?
Your OP is provocative in nature
It is not.
Its a valid platform for changing CSM, as supported by those currently not represented by CSM and with dissatisfaction regarding it.
I didnāt know for certain of any bans and I havenāt been through all of his threads, so I couldnāt say.
In an effort to try to adhere to the forum rules re discussing moderation, Iāll avoid talking in specifics, but Iām pretty sure heās had at least 3 forum bans/gags. Other people in this thread have other dirt, some of it posted, some of it too inappropriate to even post.
And nobodyās been through all his threads. They usually get too tedious to take part in and then locked.
It is not.
That is a matter of opinion, thus subjective.
Its a valid platform for changing CSM, as supported by those currently not represented by CSM and with dissatisfaction regarding it.
Once again, subjective, and assumptive too.
I donāt think your command of the English language is as good as you think it is.
Wow, I just looked up from my mobile phone for a second and when I looked backā¦ Another 200 posts. So what happend? Something with a passport?