Have you ever run for CSM?
Would that matter? As far as I am concerned, this isnât about your candidacy anyway, since you know⌠you donât do stuff regular candidates do.
Like, explaining your position. Sharing your thoughts and visions. Responding to questions. Treating questioneers seriously and with respect.
You did none of that.
Instead, I would say you are only ârunningâ because Falcon called you out.
This is the 7th time I am reiterating that you do not control the forums, you do not control who posts in a public thread, and you do not control me.
You can draw whatever incorrect conclusions you wish - you can even keep making things up out of whole cloth as you have been doing. That isnât going to change any of the three things I just told you.
Have you ever read your own posts?
Your entire forum âcareerâ has been you consistently trying to big yourself up, and failing.
You come across as what my mum calls âThe Big I Amâ. Me, I think youâre an educated fool with too much time on his hands and an overly inflated opinion of himself.
I thought they were silent because they are in asset safety after you blew up your own CSM campaign.
Does the name Raskin mean anything to you?
Nope, was he like you?
Nope.
Daniel_Raskin is nothing like me.
Whatâs your point?
Talk about your weird conversation stoppersâŚ
I could ask you the same.
You disagree with my views.
Fine.
Vote for someone else.
"donât question me, troll!
Edit: Sorry, forgot something
None of the trolls here will vote for me, no matter what I say.
Iâm not the candidate for you.
None of the trolls here will vote for me, no matter what I say.
Can a candidate vote himself?
Can a candidate vote himself?
Yes, they can.
Yes, they can.
well, then the one troll in here will probably vote for Salvos.
Only if he is subbed
You disagree with my views.
Fine.Vote for someone else
I donât have a problem with this statement, for once we actually agree on something.
Nonetheless I shall continue to question your platform and support as is the privilege of every member of the electorate.
Only if he is subbed
I would guess that he did. After all, he is posting here and holds the majority of postings in this thread.
Arrendis:
So⌠how do you propose enforcing this idea in a way that has any actual effect?
It will have actual effect as I have already proposed it and explained.
Whether you agree or not, is up to you.
After considering the arguments Arrendis laid out detailing why one candidate per corp or alliance cannot work, are you still of the opinion that it can. If so, could you please explain in as much detail how it could work.
Please note, I have considered the case of CCP requiring a candiadte to use their highest SP character and can see how such a character could still play* with member of their ex-corp through the very simple means of setting corporate standings to blue.
*(Of course sovereignty actions would be affected to some degree)