I’m just wondering what situation is safer for a DST. Obviously, nothing is 100% safe. But there are some activities that are relatively more likely to get you ship destroyed. For example, manually piloting a DST with no cloak through high sec is safer than autopiloting the same ship.
In both scenarios, a corpmate starts making a WH map 6 hours ago and finishes in 3 hours.
Scenario A. DST with interdiction nullifier undocks in system 1, a low sec system. He looks at the WH map and stargate map. System 2 is a C2 with 5 WH signatures. System 3 is a C4 with 6 WH signatures. System 4 is a C5 with 5 WH signatures. System 5 is a low sec system. System 6 is a C2, but not all signatures are scanned so the number of WHs is unknown. There are 15 unscanned signatures. System 7 is a low sec system. System 8 is a C5, but not all signatures are scanned so the number of WHs is unknown. There are 15 unscanned signatures. System 9 is a C3, but not all signatures are scanned so the number of WHs is unknown. System 10 a C2, but not all signatures are scanned so the number of WHs is unknown. There are 15 unscanned signatures. System 11 is a low sec system and has the station the pilot wants to dock with.
Scenario 2, DST with interdiction nullifier undocks in system 1, a low sec system. He looks at the WH map and stargate map. System 2 is a C2 with 5 WH signatures. System 3 is a C4 with 6 WH signatures. System 4 is a C5 with 5 WH signatures. System 5, 6,7, and 8 are low sec systems connected by gates, not WHs. System 9 is also connected by gate and it is a high sec system. System 10 a C5, but not all signatures are scanned so the number of WHs is unknown. There are 15 unscanned signatures. System 11 is a low sec system, the desired docking destination.
Scenario 3. DST pilot looks at the WH map and it doesn’t go to his destination. He plots out a chart involving shortest. System 31 is his destination, and he needs to go through a lot of gates both high sec and low sec.
In all cases, the low sec systems are not dead-end systems, but they are not the super PVP hotspot like Tama. If one scenario involved Tama and the other didn’t, the one without Tama is probably safer. And apparently Gallente space don’t have a place as PVP active as Tama… In all cases, the J-spaces are apparently quiet. “Apparently quiet” meaning that they have no upwell structures in them, no ships seen on d-scan, and no kills within the last 80 hours. If one of them had obvious signs of activity like ratters on D-scan, you probably don’t want to stuff a DST into it.
In all cases, at the time the DST pilot docks, a corpmate in a solo PVP Gnosis just jumped from system 3 to system 4 and is heading for a place beyond the DST pilot’s destination. In other words, he will pass where the DST is going. He isn’t willing to wait up unless a hostile appears on grid with another corpmate (in other words, he won’t double back to scout, but he will change routes to save a corpmate if he can), but he will keep the corp notified to anything he sees as he passes by systems.
Now obviously a safer approach is to have a +1 scout and not start a journey that involves leaving CONCORD’s protection with only a pseudo +3 (he’ll actually get farther away due to aligning faster than the DST). But between the above scenarios, which one is safer? I’m talking relative here, nothing is 100% safe.