So Where is the Game Mechanic That Allows us to Flip a key Null System to Hi-sec? :psyccp:

The carebear modus operandi is similar to an old military concept known as “peeling the onion.” They achieve their goals going through the “layers” of their issue. So let’s say their issue is that they don’t like that some high-sec space has been lost to an in-game PvE event (oh the irony). They would progress toward their goal, which is really more of a desire for revenge than anything else, like this (assume that between each entry, CCP actually implements their desires):

  1. Choose a point of contention. In this case, it’s the argument of “if it happened to us, then it should happen to them too! It’s only fair!”

  2. Null-sec invasions start happening, and contrary to the carebear assumptions, none of the players who own the space show up to help EDENCOM. The carebears would now say that it’s not fair because null-seccers are greater in numbers and more organized, so the NPC forces need to be made much stronger.
    “Give them titans!” they’ll say. “Make them one-shot the local citadels!”

  3. No one shows up to oppose the null-sec powers anyway, despite getting a handicap boost from much stronger EDENCOM NPCs. Time for Plan C:
    “CCP, create additional, special NPCs that take the spots of players to give EDENCOM a chance!”

  4. EDENCOM still loses.
    “CCP, make the Trigs who won in those systems camp every part of space 24/7 so that no one can travel or do anything!”

  5. All of the null-sec players decide to get positive standings to the Trigs, because it’s not like they give a crap about some high-sec fortress systems anyway.
    “CCP, make it impossible for null-sec players to gain standings with the Trigs!”

And on, and on, and on, until the system has been completely bastardized with dozens of changes to gameplay mechanics that they themselves didn’t have to put up with during the original iteration.

4 Likes

If you have the power to hold a sov null system(s) then you don’t need CONCORD. It is effectively safe to farm.

The fact that you are weak and powerless doesn’t change no matter where you fly.

4 Likes

No one is being forced.

No one.

Plus, this is actually the “equalize PvP and PvE” agenda …
… which has been going on for longer than this.

4 Likes

my thought was though that CONCORD in one of their key systems wouldn’t then allow them to defend their territory without considerable (guaranteed) losses, CONCORD would sort of work to make it less safer for them.

Interesting point though!

There is no “us and them”, high sec is the kiddie pool for the real game.

2 Likes

They should make a holding alliance for Niarja, and then everyone can pay to be blue to them and you can cross through. Otherwise you are shot on sight. :sunglasses:

Hey looky! Another thread the cool kid clique has descended upon and trashed!

3 Likes

Lots of badasses in this thread. Yeah take that! Our fake space ships are in a whole different part of fake space than your fake space ships! And we hit buttons that send different colored pixels towards different fake space things but our space things are cooler! You all realize we are all nerds right?

9 Likes

Sure, but if bragging about fake space ships is bad, what does that say about the people who complain about them?

And the candidate for the most useless comment in a thread goes to… this guy!

Go ahead and throw this comment out into every thread!

  • AFK cloaky camping got you down? It’s fine, we’re all nerds!

  • Having trouble getting through a gatecamp? Whoa there, buddy, don’t you know we’re all nerds!

  • Proposing a shallow and poorly thought out idea and getting criticized for it? Let’s not do that, because we’re all nerds!! Haha!

4 Likes

I didn’t even think it was worthy of a response, but you did a good job.

I like you guys.

So he wants a switch that allows him to make easy afk billions under CONCORD protection?

FTFY. :tipping_hand_woman:

1 Like

Hu? Why?
He wants to turn null systems into highsec.
No need for an umbrella when you have CONCORD.

Well, the umbrella kills before a kill happens, whereas CONCORD only kills after the kill. Thus the umbrella is better. When nullbears quitted en masse after The Blackout it was not over the chance of losing their ship without retaliation -but about the chance of losing their ship/drones without a warning, as usually happens to miners in highsec.

I don’t know where you got this from. CONCORD doesn’t kill after the kill.
The CONCORD timer starts counting as soon as the first aggression is made.

This is no different to the supercap umbrella.
When whatever “protection force” not fast enough, the ganker wins.

CONCORD has the upside that it’s reliable, while people aren’t.
That doesn’t mean that they’re guaranteed to save anyone,
but they’re still reliable.

4 Likes

That is not correct. Concord kills when you break the rules.

Things are simple. CCP wana remove all high-sec systems. So there is no way to recover.

If CCP removed HS

Wont that make NS Sov HS?

For the krabs ofc

1 Like