Quote it.
Betcha $5 it has something to do with responding to the actual points and not making up your own.
Anyone less blind-sided than you just has to follow the conversation to see it for themselves.
Whatever part Iād quote, youād just reject it because it doesnāt line up with your missing understanding of game mechanics.
1 Like
That thread needs to be erased as a non stop circle of pointless arguments.
Although mine was relevant I thought, but the OP blocked me because he didnāt like responding to questions without quoting wilkepedia.
Minimize local or go to wormhole space as intended? Itās optionalā¦everyone likes choices.
Congrats, all you did was quote my first post and not where I supposedly got āwreckedā.
Yeah, because Iāve never hunted caps and ratters before /s
I didnāt quote anything, I linked the thread so that everyone more knowledgeable than you can read for themselves how clueless you are. You know, like I wrote below the link.
you seem agitated linus gorp, car to explain?
1 Like
Iām not for censorship of the forums, but Iād certainly appreciate a personal āsquelch/ignore/blacklistā button to block out offenders Iāve no wish to see cluttering up otherwise interesting conversations. They can still post without moderator intervention to their heartās content, but my personal feed is streamlined away from stuff Iāve no desire to endure.
For example, a Dev blog suffers from two dozen posts of unrelated bickering between two people - effectively shutting out solid questions and potential helpful responses lost in the chatter. Iād love to squelch the two parties, ideally temporarily, so I can reasonably follow the conversation without having to mentally hopscotch 50% of a thread into ādonāt bother to read thisā category
1 Like