1.) yes
2.) yes
3.) NO, the ships are already combat efficient if you have a brain, not a carebear, or otherwise stupid and stubborn(asinine) and not some greedy afk botter.
1 Like
Then why you never came up with any answer for the FACT :
1 Like
Because weâre done?
- You made the thread to ask for a combat bonused mining barge.
- We informed you that there is a combat bonused mining barge.
- You refuse to accept that there is a combat bonused mining barge and make ridiculous statements like âthose ship bonuses only apply to fighting NPCâs and not player shipsâ which everyone can see is nonsense because no bonus in the game works like that.
- Then you continue asking for point 1 as if there has been no answer
This thread is potentially endless if you refuse to accept the answer that is right in front of you.
Thatâs why I think itâs better closed.
then tell us which changes would have your improvements to all miners ?
would they now be able to defend theirself ?
are they generating more isk with mining ?
i will answer both questions â No ! if you think different explain yourself !
PS: i´m sure you cant answer this questions 
The benefits of a combat mining barge means that alliance, corporation or individual miners will be able to adequately defend their mining operations against a few navy types of battlecruisers and will be able to totally defend theirself against a fleet of five destroyers looking for targets to kill.
The combat barge would also give Low and Null sec miners more flexibility in their mining operations.
The combat mining barge would also create a quick reaction force to defend a gate or structure until the larger combat dedicated ships arrived.
That alliance, corporation or those individual miners can already adequately defend their mining operations, by bringing combat ships if they insist to hold grid while hostiles are around.
Rorquals even are able to make the entire combat fleet invulnerable with PANIC while waiting for backup combat ships to arrive.
An attentive miner would however make sure they warp away before any hostiles arrive.
1 Like
I remember a fleet of procs in nullsec defeating a few Sins, T2 BS on their ownâŚ
Your ideas have no merit, your peers have judged that already.
@ISD_Traindriver could we have this thread closed please, its going no where.
And where is the proof of these Procurers defeating Sins in Null?
The last time I checked, SOP for Sins in Null is always have ships on back up to portal in for assistance.
Incorrect, you do not know who I am, try 15 years.
yes i did, cause i pay attention to all things political, because I am an Indy person.
you might be right, cause I am better than you at this game. meaning you are beneath me.
untrue, if they dont know or dont want to fit their ships appropriately. Especially in HS since you mention Gankers(ganking happens in HS only), people simply cant use the current ship lines cause they are lazy and want to AFK or Greedy and think EvE is an instant gratification game, when instead the Tortoise will always beat out the Hare.
3 Likes
If players consent to PvP at the undock, then PvPers have to accept mining barges being able to fight and win against station camping PvPerâs.
removed several posts for the below reasons
1. Specifically restricted conduct.
The purpose of the EVE Online forums is to provide a platform for exchange of ideas, and a venue for the discussion of EVE Online. Occasionally there will be conflicts that arise when people voice opinions. Forum users are expected to courteous when disagreeing with others.
In order to maintain an environment where everyone is welcome and discussion flows freely, certain types of conduct are prohibited on the EVE Online forums. These are:
- Trolling
- Flaming
- Ranting
- Personal Attacks
- Harassment
- Doxxing
- Racism & Discrimination
- Hate Speech
- Sexism
- Spamming
- Bumping
- Off-Topic Posting
- Pyramid Quoting
- Rumor Mongering
- New Player Bashing
- Impersonation
- Advertising
3. Post constructively.
Negative feedback can be very useful to further improve EVE Online if it is presented in a civil and factual manner. All users are encouraged to honestly express their feelings regarding EVE Online and how it can be improved. Posts that are non-constructive, insulting or in breach of the rules will be deleted regardless of how valid the ideas behind them may be. Users are also reminded that posting with a lack of content also constitutes non-constructive posting.
1 Like
And by using combat assets such as protecting Procurer barges and other type of barges, those same cruisers, battlecruiser, etc. are spread out across Sov and would take more time to respond to a large enemy presence, which could lead to Sov loss.
The Combat Barge allows the mining fleet to defend itself so the actual combat ships can be deployed where they are needed, at the front line.
I think a Min/Gal and Armar/Cal collaboration on combat barges would create new type of barge.
Min/Gal
Bonuses to Hybrid weapons and Rockets + light drone bonuses.
Amar/Cal
Bonuses to Beam Weapons and Missiles + mining drone bonuses.
Youâve not given a direct reasoning why, outside of the procurer, a combat mining barge (whatever that actually means), should be a consideration.
if youre not able to hold your SOV then its not because youre sitting actualy in a procurer xD its because you cant defend your home !
new mining ships cant change this fact
Vuhdo Rin, you have been ignored permenantly.
Min/Gal would have bonuses to mining range
While Cal/Amarrian would have bonuses for ore cargo.
Both would have bonuses for ore compression and reduced damage to mining crystals.
again ? oO
you know that ore compression is a thing you can only get from an industrial command ship with an compression module ? xD
ok ⌠lets summarizes your wishlist of your mega overpowered ship 
- you want more ore mining ( doesnt make any sense i could explain why if someone ask )
- you want a combat mining vessel ( you could fly a procurer ) wich could be fielded at the front with any chance to win big fights ⌠oO
- you want more ore minig range without links
- you want a bigger cargo
- you want all of this with a build in compression array
at my PoV it looks like you are completly insane and lost any sense of reality ! but its just my PoV
1 Like
No, itâs not just you.
At this rate Dryson must have half the forum âpermanently ignored.â
Bet if he knew about the Rorqualâs temporary invulnerably module heâs be demanding that be made for every size mining ship. The fact that heâs not tells me he doesnât know it exists. 
3 Likes
At this point I hope they just add a low slot module (or maybe a rig?) that grants the equipped ship 1,000 m3 of ore hold space, stackable with multiple modules. That way OP can just use those on a battleship and not have any room to ask for more lol.
You mean like when they finally got the armed hauler theyâve been bleating about for two decades, only to then demand more in this very thread not even a month later?
No, these people donât know when to stop asking for more, and it gets worse every time CCP indulges their little tantrums.
1 Like
Nope, not unless it is a Triglavian Combat Mining Barge built around the hull of the Leshak.