Tactical shield manipulation idea šŸ›”ļø

Vuhdo is a little rough in debate, but I don’t think he is trolling. He has… strong opinions.

Ignoring people argument and making personal attacks is trolling.
Repeating the same wrong thing also is. Like that time he pretended infinite painters on a target would produce infinite sig.

based on your wrong numbers :wink:

Well, infinite painters on a target will in theory produce infinite killers on Zkill :grin:

It will more likely produce infinite memory usage on the server. as well as infinite time dilation.
So a crash.
(assuming it does not need infinite source of painter, eg a bug makes a single rat produce infinite painters. Otherwise if it needs infinite players then the DB will also not handle it)

But even after 100 painter there is no difference at all, so his claim about infinity was wrong. Actually even after 10 there is barely any difference . So when he claimed that with painters alone you could increase the sig to any value, he was wrong. And then he proceeded to use numbers I exhibited for something else and which I literally claimed were incorrect past a point, as if they were not incorrect.
So yes, that’s trolling.

2 Likes

nonono xD i just used your numbes you came up for this offtopic spam you came with :wink: and if you know these numbers are wrong why do you show these numbers … so its ā– ā– ā– ā– ā– ā– ā– ā–  !

Textbook logical fallacies. And a stubborn refusal to acknowledge the other side’s arguments in a debate.

You debate with some skills because you are willing to research and present facts and actually address a reasoned discussion with consideration to the person you are talking to. Not everyone will do that.

Normally I would just consider a personal attack as an automatic ā€œwinā€ and move on. Argument for argument’s sake is kind of a waste of time. And of course drop a meme where it is appropriate.

image

1 Like

Why does narcissism run rampant on these forums?

What did the developer say? You kinda left that part out.

And, proof is required with a direct citation to what they really did say.

Proof required.

I recall the forum level of jerkiness being about the same jerkiness as it is now.

So, you want people to applaud your terrible ideas affirming how amazing you are despite the fact that they disagree with you?

Ya. I’m done with pandering to the entitled participation trophy generation.

So I suggest that you strap on a helmet because what I’m going to say next is going to affront your delicate sensibilities.

Your idea sucks and would break the current damage mitigation mechanic.

But spamming the same thing even when I explained why it’s wrong, making false quotes (literally removing ā€œnotā€ from my quote, after having removed the exact text where I say the opposite of his claim in another one), THAT is trolling.

And then the issue is that his advices are bad, since they are based on wrong assumptions. But it’s easier to make a lot of stupid claims than to debunk them (asymmetry principle). so he just keeps making the same stupid claim and then pretend he is right because I did not debunk them the last time.
THAT is trolling.

1 Like

Agreed.

oh wait, I almost forgot…

image

didnt u realice youre actual the only one who“s trolling and spamming this thread with nonsense offtopic ?

only because it looks like you are not able to argue aganst me and now you wanna defame me !

You know trolls like this sometimes are helpful even when they don’t notice they keep you at top :wink:

Several years ago the same argument came to light by individual personally attacking me and referring that I’m unable to produce any constructive ideas,
Back then the forum was on its original structure and I was able to locate and copy the content and I was able to produce it for the person to see and after that I never heard I’ll see him again trolling on my posts , I’m sorry that I cannot find the content anymore , it was time that CCP asked players to participate on a decision in replacing the UI targets they dedicated a special room only for this purpose , and my idea was the only constructive idea as a developer pointed out because the rest of them they were just arguing like now and not actually producing any results if not because of me you probably would have a square box two vertical bars.

The skill already does this crap, it is part of the inherent mechanics for Passive Regen fits…

I do not understand what the OP is asking for, since the mechanic used properly on the proper fits it is designed for…ALREADY EXISTS…so I have to ask:

WTF?

Nah. The skill reduces this effect, until it removes it at V .

The only constructive idea? I seriously doubt that.

I think you’re giving yourself a bit too much credit. It’s more probable that CCP already had the idea in-situ and you happened to mention it at the time they implemented it. So it looks like it was due to your idea, but in fact was more likely that it was more of a coincidence.

I seriously doubt you had anything to do with it. Unless, of course you can produce the patch notes that name you as the source for the idea, then, and only then, I will praise you for it.

.

2 Likes

Terrible idea

This topic was automatically closed 90 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.