What are you even talking about, null sec has local, poch does not its more comparable to wormholes.
Inflation is actually a good thing as long as it doesnât get out of control. And if it gets out of control, CCP can just increase the sinks all around EVE, as simple as that.
Inflation is terrible, because you cannot save your money as it will always be worth less the next day.
Itâs not a real issue unless the inflation goes way out of control. At the same time if a player leaves with a big fortune, heâs a little bit less rich when he comes back which I donât see as a bad thing.
A fully fit armageddon is 400mil now it was 100mil 5 years back
3 Likes
bwahahahahahaha loooool
i wouldnât wanna join a corp that doesnât monitor suspicious activities
And what exactly is your disadvantage if they spy on themselves?
Got cought stealing and now you canât join a decent alliance, or something?
Thatâs the point, why do you want to join somebody you donât know / trust? Donât do it, or better create structures which donât need trust to work. Which is the key.
1 Like
i guess youâre right.
can i join your corp? Im even willing to do logistics and stuff 
1 Like
Sure, if I ever create one, Iâll come back to you ⌠lol.
3 Likes
No you donât.
You get the mission, you shoot the npcs, you come back, the mission agent gives you ISK. Not burners, normal HS missioning.
No, you were talking about making large groups impossible to run. And the change youâre suggesting doesnât do that. It doesnât do that because what enables large groups isnât ESI access, itâs out-of-client communications. Thatâs not moving the goalposts, itâs explaining why youâre wrong.
Counterintelligence. Thatâs it. Itâs not to administrate the group, itâs to be able to see âhey, this guyâs getting regular payments from [Character] in an enemy alliance, he might be a spyâ or âyes, this is the guy whoâs been acquiring supers and shipping them out to re-sell at a discount to our enemiesâ.
Thatâs it. Without those tools, weâd wind up locking other things down a bit more, and weâd return to more restrictive policies, but it wouldnât impact our normal operations.
Because the organization provides opportunities to do things that you canât get elsewhere. If I only work with people I know and trust, Iâd be working with the same 8 guys I came to EVE with, except theyâve all stopped playing, so I would have, too.
1 Like
I hate doing logistics, industry and long travel times.
A big Null Alliance can provide a Market hub right at my front door, Infrastructure, Allies that work together to defend everyones assets. Lots of Crab hunters that can be shot AND Customers to buy the loot i take from them.
Organised groups for special interest activities.
Opportunities to make new friends.
Joining world record braking space battles.
That and an active Corp with people to chat with and help each other out on a day to day basis - those are the people i trust, the real and meaningful friendships but also people comming and going over time. You never know who might turn out to be a thief or spy and in Eve it would be stupid not to protect what you love.
1 Like
Good, that is all what I want to achieve, though I donât believe your spin. Letâs do it then!
2 Likes
See Arendisâ answer. Goons wouldnât have an issue with that.
1 Like
I am not Goonswarm. I am a member of Goonswarm, and a part of the leadership group that has nothing to do with CI or services. My opinions are my own, as I have said multiple times. To attempt to conflate my personal opinions with an official position from Goonswarm is either an error, or dishonest. Stop.
4 Likes
A) Youâre lying. Us locking down services a bit is not what you want to achieve. You want, by your own statements:
Which, (B) once again, your suggestion would not do. Weâd simply move to more 3rd-party tools, rather than CCPâs tools.
1 Like
Goons are the best lead and organised Alliance in the game, if they can deal with it doesnât mean everyone else can - just think of Co² 
1 Like
Which would make it easier to ban you all for abusing macros and scripts. Win win.
1 Like
While missions are indeed a source of isk, the MER constantly shows their impact to be far, far below many other sources. Lumping them in with the major causes of EVEâs economic issues is like standing in a blazing forest fire and pointing at the sun as the cause of the burning feeling you are having. Course, you probably included them for completion on the issue.
2 Likes
Except neither of those is what Iâm talking about. So good job not having a clue.
1 Like
So many salt from people speack of thing they doânt understand.
I will repeat myself (and i know one of you troll on reddit with that so i repeat here):
You could remove standing
Make alliance limit to 500 character
Make peopel canât dock in ncitadel if itâs not theyâre alliance citadel âŚ
Remove ESI
You will just nerf little and medium size entity.
Big alliance will see very few change , beacause they already have a lot of member who make active intel (you know intel in 0.0 is not free and not make by bot ⌠i know a lot of people think that but itâs not the case ⌠or not the case in imperium).
But for little and medium entity size , it means loose zkill , loose all kind of free intel give by 3RD tool, loose way to manage and planify⌠and a lot of medium/smll entity will be explode by fear of spy.
You could said what you want, itâs blackout level of discussion : you think it will work , and people who know the game (arrendis , and in this post me ) explain you why you havenât understand nothing.
Ho and i m not in big bloc administration ⌠i m just the bingo man of the imperium ⌠So imagine a man who spend his time to make BINGO explain to âelit pvp playerâ why theyâre assumption fakeâŚ
Maybe learn to play, try different game play , and back to speack when you masterise the subject.
1 Like