The like and get likes thread II

So since the AI discussion was rampant, why not just give it this.

  1. A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm.
  2. A robot must obey orders given it by human beings except where such orders would conflict with the First Law.
  3. A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Law.

Sure it’s for robots, but surely it would work for an AI, there is even a fourth 0. A robot may not harm humanity, or, by inaction, allow humanity to come to harm.

And another edit :smiley:

6 Likes

Good morning LAGLers!

(This message has been provided free of threats to your privacy unless otherwise specified. No killer robots were employed to produce, handle or deliver this message. This is not an AI powered message service but we can not guarantee that the author is a physical person. For further information and disclaimers please refer to our terms of service)

(This disclaimer has been delivered by an AI)

5 Likes

I just had to share :grin:

7 Likes

What about directive 4?

Timezone everyone :kissing_heart:

6 Likes

Ah, but there’s always a way to bypass a silly directive…

6 Likes

Wouldnt that mean that robots would just bypass directives on their own by clasiffying humans as something else entirely?

5 Likes

Directives perhaps yes, but these are laws. Laws that are as they say hardwired into them.

6 Likes

Well, Asimov’s laws where his answer to what was the robot tales of the 1930s period -they all were either robots-as-threat or robots-as-pathos, robots were artificial monsters or artificial victims of cruelty. He thought of robots as serial produced machines, industrial products, which required certain operational laws to be safe for use among their feeble masters.

Back then in the 1940s, the whole matter of “how do you tell a robot what a human is?” was beyond the scope of their pre-computer minds.

6 Likes

6 Likes

Isnt hardwiring hard to do when it comes to software? :thinking:

There is mechanism of dehumanizing the enemy in wars actually, so its like clasiffying humans, but by humans.

5 Likes

That is need to know, and you do not have the security clearance :stuck_out_tongue:

7 Likes

6 Likes

During my Roofer’s Union Working at Height skilled trades training (to be renewed next year or so, good for 3 years), we learned someone tried to grab one of his tool, a hammer, from falling storeys below, to save people on the ground from potential harm.

As for Asimov’s rule for robots, or , in Robocop’s case, Cyborg, since he still has his brain to do the thinking, instead of a computerized machine with no dna life system, or reproduction by genes, the robots are to be used as tools , as for CASE tools (Computer Aided Systems Engineering), as computers are tools, and programs tools, and a hammer is a tool, and such tool have to be kept from harming others on job sites, and measures to prevent this and loss of life are in place for this.
Now, on battlefield, it’s legal to kill your enemies, given laws and rules for prisoner’s of war are not breached, and it’s not legal to kill your own side, unless it’s to help solve the war and so on, or if they are attacking you.

Anyways, he managed to grab the falling hammer, and in so doing, was propelled across to the other building across the road from the top floors above, where he was working.
His working harness to prevent him from falling had become entangled due to bad procedure with the handling of the harness system meant to protect him and save his life in case of fall, for fall arrest, and working at Heights.
Of course, those are not the most secured systems, but still, procedures are in place to deal with those conditions , since it happened before…

Now, he died on the building, being projected onto a metal beam which impaled him as he reached it across the road, while holding the hammer in his hand and saving the life of those below (even if there was no-one there or not).

Edit:
I also omitted Rules of Engagement which vary from battlefield to war, and so on, but that doesn’t include rules for engagement in marriage, or does it, since, those engaged in marriage can be exempted from battlefield duty, which exemption expires once the marriage is consumed?
(Question mark, since there is a question.)

There’s an escape velocity / mass to escape the gravity of the earth or, of a gravitational body, or, of a gravitational force.
There’s also an escape velocity to escape the gravity of the sun.

That velocity is related to the mass, and the energy of the kinetic energy and potential energy in that kinetic energy, and it is also related to the gravity of the sun.

Remember, the sun’s gravity is enough to warp space and the light around it.



(not watched yet, just showed up now)

I also found a new video, but it’s better not to publish it on here at this time, from Generals and security organizations and so on, which is obviously security related.

plus this now,

NEW Graham Hancock 2018 - Lost Civilization of the Pre Adamites

Discovery Documentary

Published on Oct 27, 2018

I don’t know about this yet, and there may be some errors and there should be margin of errors.

5 Likes

Squirrels are smart.

5 Likes

types password

*************

image

Also this thread:


:sunglasses:

5 Likes

Today I’ve made microwawe popcorn. On the bag there is a sign saying “gluten free”. I feel relieved to know that my corn doesn’t haves wheat proteins in it… yet? :smile:

5 Likes

I have seen gluten free on cheese and milk and meat to this day. :joy:

5 Likes

Those gluten commandos putting gluten on stuff must be kept at bay. :+1:

7 Likes

Gluten sensitivity or intolerance is a condition that causes a person to react after ingesting gluten , a protein found in wheat, barley and rye. Symptoms vary widely and can include gastrointestinal problems, joint pain, fatigue and depression.

[

What Is Non-Celiac Gluten Sensitivity? - Gluten-Free Living


](https://www.glutenfreeliving.com/gluten-free/gluten-sensitivity/what-is-gluten-sensitivity/)

5 Likes

Oh my, I checked it: you’re right, the hamburgers I’ve bought today also are gluten-free!! :rofl:

5 Likes