Well, yes, on the Moon, robots fix you.
They fix broken robots by replacing their batteries when they expire,
and they recycle the robots they don’t use anymore.
They can also put the material back into the smelter.
Edit before 05:49:
48K views - 6 hours ago
50,961 views • Feb 27, 2020
Anton Petrov
455K subscribers
Edit at 09:17:
Warning, people sometimes fight when the market crashes, to protect it.
Tomorrow is another today.
Good night, lovelies. 
First case of coronavirus on Iceland! CCP cancels fanfest!
Oh noes! Hurry, fetch an earworm!
Straight from Mexico!
(Now I wonder, are earworms in a foreign language as catchy as in your own language?)
But I’m off to bed, so, nighties lovelies!
Also: I’m divided about this one
It might be cool, but the trailer is so slooow and after all, this started as a series of drawings. There’s literally no story behind. Divided I am.
Feb 26, 2020, 7:36 PM
448,266 views • Oct 16, 2019
Tech Insider
2.97M subscribers
779,397 views • Nov 9, 2019
Quest TV
421K subscribers
https://vk.com/video-34740837_456261380
3 people died from CO2 poisoning. Party that ended really bad. There was 30 kg of dry ice what they had there… 
Short movie
3D VR Venera probe on Venus. 
50,200 views • Feb 29, 2020
50K views - 4 hours ago
Marcus House
114K subscribers
Edit @ 22:15:
Yeet Fleet.
If they don’t, we will. It’s 1918 all over again (Maybe.).
… now for something uplifting.
Merry Leap Day!
It comes only once a year. Okay, four years.
In the Gregorian calendar, three criteria must be taken into account to identify leap years:
||The year must be evenly divisible by 4;|
| — | — |
||If the year can also be evenly divided by 100, it is not a leap year;|
||unless…|
||The year is also evenly divisible by 400. Then it is a leap year.|
According to these rules, the years 2000 and 2400 are leap years,
while 1800, 1900, 2100, 2200, 2300, and 2500 are not leap years.
The year 2000 was somewhat unique as it was the first instance when the third criterion was used in most parts of the world since the start of the transition from the Julian calendar to the Gregorian calendar in 1582.
4,332 views • Feb 29, 2020
464 Thumbs Up ; 8 Thumbs down
The 5th Kind
292K subscribers
7,757 views • Premiered 5 hours ago
2,549,613 views • Nov 10, 2015
The Carol Burnett Show Official
196K subscribers
241,602 views • Feb 29, 2020
234K views - 8 hours ago
SmarterEveryDay
7.81M subscribers
1,060,029 views • Jul 3, 2014
The Royal Institution
720K subscribers
583,652 views • Nov 14, 2013
RC286
5.27K subscribers
160,621 views • Feb 22, 2020
Subject Zero Science
70.6K subscribers
69,368 views • Feb 28, 2020
68K views - 1 day ago
George Gammon
64.8K subscribers
rma-hq-ability-to-fight
The old giant chinese boats with multiple layers look like old pyramids, found in South America and India as well…
There was a YouTube video about what those boats look like.
It’s obviously an old architectural system.
“Ever loved someone so much you would do anything for them?
Yeah, well, make that someone yourself.” - Harvey Specter
Lots of links shared in the past 2 days.
May the person with the best image editing skills win.
Timezone lovelies. 
#OnThisDay 1976: Peter Purves showed off a computer that could store phone numbers and maps. Imagine the possibilities!
That was the kind of program my friend who sold me my Timex Sinclair paid to learn and train in.
He said it was not very good, and was a BASIC program for his 2nd hand Apple IIe back then.
It was however better than he evaluated it.
It would have required more updating of course, however, the intellectual property possible to get from it was quite valuable at the time.
In 1984 / 1985, his program was not so much for maps but contact list, compared to , let’s say, phone numbers, with names and address.
Pretty much the exact same thing, except contacts list can include more data.
His didn’t, and would have had to be included, like old phone books would, for more expensive listings…
Bed time for me. Tomorrow I’m going to have a class with the kids.
Good night, lovelies.
Today I’ve had a intense day, wnet on a daily trip with my fmaily, visited a ncie town, climbed a small promontory and enjoyed nice sea views, ha dlunch at a chep and good restaurant… Now i’m tired and hope will rest well. Nighties lovelies!
Also: what can go wrong with a video about impaled water droplets?
Fascinating. Wait for the intermediate angle cone… 
Yes,
I have another video of a plane taking off in what seems to be heavy fog,
but if people were smoking that much it could have caused the bird problems.
115,283 views • Apr 1, 2016
Science Channel
3.07M subscribers
This video is old, but it’s funny it’s published on April 1, 2016.
It’s hard to believe that this measurement system was not verified before, and that the error was not attributed to a hack after.
I’m apparently offered money to hack for security with businesses, however, I have no valid concrete offers, compared to actual fraud cases interfering against the same offers, not surprisingly.
Those are no doubt the same entities trying to control communications and forfeit evidence with the design of their systems, like if it was hard to find .
86,737 views • Feb 24, 2020
The Science Asylum
204K subscribers
This one analysis how fusion works.
They also tested it on earth, instead of somewhere else further in space…
That might also give more energy to deal with gravitational waves, and, time…
436,781 views • Feb 28, 2020
The People
51K subscribers
202,144 views • Feb 25, 2020
After Skool
913K subscribers
This one has Göbekli Tepe 10,000 years ago.
Antarctica, before 20,000 years ago, since Ice Sheets covered it then, flooding it with ice.
However, human exist 10 times longer or 20 times longer, except there is not that many architecture left from then.
Oh, this one is interesting. Apparently Boeing didn’t run a full test of the Atlas V and Starliner capsule together, which led to software errors going unnoticed.
You know, Boeing really wasn’t a big contractor for the Apollo missions. And although Boeing eventually absorbed some of the contractors, their know-how was 50 years ago and obviously hasn’t transpired into today’s Boeing. Boeing are newcome players to the rocketry field and they shouldn’t be cut slack, specially with the mounting evidence that Boeing has become lazy and cheap and federal agencies (neither FAA nor NASA) don’t have the means to control Boeing’s disregard of excellence.
Very pretty 
and relaxing 
I have bad news tho.
Robots are starting to squeeez out last drops of sweat from people
But its HUMANS that put robot management into positions! 
Certain unethical and intelligence people would do that.
While intelligence strategy is not moral, it doesn’t mean that they have to be unethical.
If the robots try to coerce the morality of a family into sex crimes, it can be inciting incest,
and that certainly causes moral problems, and it is also certainly dealt with by higher moral entities.
I know about business analysis already being done from robots, or, programs, since, those were some of the first programs to be designed, since it affected all other aspects of business, and, government, who get their taxes them, and can use it to design systems for themselves as well.
Even IBM has the exact same business name in it, as it does so manage and create business machine, and automate business processes, including business financial administration systems.
When communication gap are created to mislead people and try to obligate them to learn because they would otherwise suffer from exploitation of that communication gap, when that gap is used to create immorality for life, and blame it on the target, the perpetrators of the acts are no better if not worst than the intended target, even if they meant it as a method to diminish their liability for all intelligence purposes.
That it why the army intervenes.
My robot doesn’t like that robot can certainly be real, and it doesn’t have to be for unfair competition, or national defense.
As long as there are valid grounds for it, it can be justified.
People should not be enslaved by robots, unless they have forfeited their rights amongst other things.
Like, why shouldn’t robot enslave people who try to enslave others, as a form of punishment.?
They already break the law, and if so, then, should pay.
Now, of course, the decision as to who enslave what and so on is more complicated than a decision based on will without circumstantial evidence and other related facts, which does change a lot of the details related to this, not to mention problems from misleading and other intelligence activity, however, it is true.
Edit:
For instance, if I own a program I designed to control management of a business, and the people who work there are monitored and controlled by it for management, I have to be responsible for the robot, not the robot be responsible for people’s conditions and results.
So, if there is a fault, not only does the insurance cover, but I also have to make sure that system is under control.
If some people start to try to work under it, and it is not designed to make them work, and they misinterpret the robot, program, and system, and try to use it as a weapon to hurt themselves, and wrongfully hold me liable of damage for it, they are liable for trying to do so.
If they got away by doing this to others, and made $40,000 a year from doing it, they are also liable for it, and I am not allowed to be associating with them, even if they offer me money to hack.
There is no doubt some other architect would be providing them to do this kind of work for others, regardless of the damage they may cause to others , again by trying to control robots and intellectual property rights by forfeiture, they also may not be ethical, even if some courts wrongfully said that they are good members of the community, which community may themselves cause themselves and others problems with it, and try to attribute it to the ethical system they try to marginalize…
It’s like 2 consenting adults to do terrorism, although they consent, they can’t consent to do something illegal.
They can consent to associate to do something legal.
If the law is wrong, it may not even be their responsibility to solve the problem.
If the legal problem causes the analyst problem, he may well be advised to solve that problem.
Edit @ 18:31:
That’s not good. It may have revealed it, it may have been revealed before, they didn’t fix it in time, that is the bottom line. They should have done it and done more to make sure it is better than that.
They didn’t fix it in time, is still the exact same bottom line as before.
What?
Just because they can improve doesn’t mean they can’t pay more.
Of course they should be able to make their payment more efficient, and get safer results.
What is safe for some is not necessarily good or safe at all.
People’s perception is the main cause, source, and reasons for this.
While focus may be good to speed certain things, it may not work when the focus has to be on a larger scope of things, and that tunnel visions is causing errors and problems.
It doesn’t take a genius to figure out they don’t pay me for this.
A genius may figure out they don’t pay me enough for this.
