More of the same for me, and why I need a degree in this field not to mention psychiatry.
That would really pay me government money to invest in computers or camera companies like Kodak (if you get the picture).
The more crazy they get can mean more money in my pocket and family business, including real estate value.
Don’t stop them all at the same time.
Edit:
Yes, one in, instead of 2 in in , will suffice.
At least I appear to have one. Laws exist for a reason. Calling people that call ruthless, scumback corporations out on the ■■■■ they do “haters” is only further proof that you appear to be unable to think beyond the basic layer. Just like most people, so you’re at least in good company.
Lots of technological advances are due to the Nazis. Rockets, the entire medical sector, atomic energy, physics breakthroughs, …
That doesn’t absolve them from all the horrible things they did. Just the same as Intel’s advances of the IC sector doesn’t absolve them of their illegal business practices, their blatant abuse of a monopoly position, their general scumback attitude towards competitors and customers and their decisions to ignore security just to achieve higher benchmark scores.
Facts matter. Disregarding facts with “haters gonna hate” only makes you look like a mindless drone, incapable of thinking for yourself.
burst someone’s bubble
phrase of bubble
1.
shatter someone’s illusions about something or destroy someone’s sense of well-being.
Translations, word origin and more definitions
Like, or, as in,
mental health is a myth.
The reality is that everyone is crazy to certain level.
Is bursting the bubble of those who think people can live without being crazy, or making false sense of reality to others, so as to avoid being targeted from them, while themselves prosecute them, or, use it for attacks.
Most military chips are slower to process large amounts of data, but faster at faster processing of smaller amounts of data.
When that data is more efficient, as military systems are designed to be for emergency situations, they can be more efficient.
When ran on civilian systems, they seem outdated or less efficient, because they are designed to do so.
That not only lets the other systems work better, but it also protects them from unwanted attacks.
2ndly, not all military systems are designed to be better for emergency.
Edit:
I can’t call honest systems which uses Intel chip and lie about me and my systems design and try to seek forfeiture of it in courts.
It’s also against the well being of my family.
The military police calls them enemy.
Bonus track. We get electric cars and build electric brains that sooner or later will learn to drive… but meanwhile, human error is there, ready to take a toll.
It doesn’t take a genius to figure out that the same court which controls the monopoly for cars and prosecute me don’t care about nuclear weapons and superior technology and science that it takes to maintain.
They are happy to have more money to throw at the court to protect themselves with a false sense of reality.
The people who die from war or other is not their concern, but they are liable.
They rather keep money in system failing, with their associates, instead of making it efficient enough.
They’ve always done it that way.
Why change it?
It’s not a popular system.
In this case, one human to many.
Every attacks since 1945 has been the same.