A) If you want to address me, speak my name or click reply on my post. You did neither. Saves me having to fking ask for clarification.
B) What the fk makes you think I dont actively act against people blaming the game or others rather than themselves for their mistakes?
What the fk is your point? Are you high?
Wat?
Has it occurred to you that:
3. You are not making any sense, let alone as relating to topic?
You claimed that someone that could have perhaps prevented a murder, is somehow guilty of that murder. Are you that estranged from legal and objective reality that you think that is the case, much more wtf is the relevance to EVE?
If someone standing next to me shoots someone and kills someone, how am I guilty of murder? You need your head checked, man.
In EVE, if someone blows up a ship near me, is that somehow my fault cos I didnt intervene?
So you don’t want to answer my questions?
How do you, yourself, answer your own question, cos Im confused what you think you are asking.
You said that there are many who think like I do. I do not question that they exist, but I question that it matters. As long as they are single, independent voices, they don’t matter. To prove my point, I ask questions:
I don’t mean to be aggressive. I ask these questions, because I believe that they bring up the point I’m trying to make. So I ask you to answer them. 
What have you done that you presume to ask this of others?
That’s 1) in other words paired with denial because you don’t want to or can’t comprehend the argument, despite having it explained to you.
There’s actually a legal definition for it. It’s called complicity to murder, like I pointed out a few posts above. And yes, you can go to jail for it for a very long time.
You need to read and comprehend before trying to counter an argument.
Does it matter? Is there a legal system in EVE? Are there any repercussions if you don’t do anything? Are there repercussions if you do?
Try abstraction. It really isn’t hard to see the correlation between my comment and yours.
He wants you to start thinking about what you write and what he writes in response to it. Something you’ve been quite stubborn to refuse so far.
Stop. Please. It’s too much.
Why are you not simply answering the questions?
Politeness isn’t going to get you anywhere when directness is required to get the point across.
You dont understand law, much less the most demanding and exclusive charge of murder.
Nor is any of that relevant to EVE.
Blowing up a ship in EVE is not murder.
Nor is standing near someone that commits murder.
You have no idea what you are talking about.
Its not a matter of “abstraction”, its a complicated result of legality resulting from thousands of years of jurisprudence.
Exactly.
I want him to start thinking about what he wrote and what he writes in response to mine. Something he has been quite stubborn to refuse so far.
He cant.
If I would have another example for the same point, I’d have used it. But would that have helped, I doubt it.
It IS a matter of abstraction. Because I made an ABSTRACT point and just used a specific example to make that point. Instead of comprehending the abstract point I made, you’re entirely focusing on the specific example, while also ignoring parts of exactly that example.
That’s where you went wrong and that’s why you don’t get the point. You’re seeing it from the completely wrong angle.
You compared EVE ship destruction to murder.
You claimed anyone that does not prevent a murder, is complicit in murder.
You claimed murder is a matter of abstraction.
All the above are unequivocably false.
Ship destruction in EVE is not murder.
Not stopping a murder, does not make you complicit.
Murder is not an abstract, it is a concrete result of both intent and act.
I told you.
I dont understand your fking paragraph long question.
Answer it yourself first and show me what it is you want to know.
I’ll stop torturing you with it. But answer me one question, please. Are you sober?
So your intent was to torture me?
And now you try to imply that I am somehow impaired (by alcohol).
Wtf is wrong with you?
Not at all, no. I merely intended for that to mean that I’ll stop trying to get you do understand my point.
It’s just a guess because I usually know you to be able to make decent arguments and comprehend a point. Your reactions in this thread don’t really fit how I usually perceive you, hence the question if you’re influenced by something at the moment.
Autism. No social competence 'n such. Hence why I’m so direct. It’s because my brain doesn’t work like that of a “normal” person.
Ok. Fair enough.
State to me, in one direct, concise statement, what is your point with all this.