I like the character view; probably helps that I spend some time to make sure my characters look good. Would be nice if CCP added some controls so you can rotate the character.
1 Like
It has a 10%-30% impact on GPU frame rate. Itâs 3D.
I strongly suspect that Mike has more understanding of how the CSM operates, and exactly how much attention CCP pay to them than most people in this threadâŚ
3 Likes
Do we really need people posting screenshots of the rear of their avatars and asking âDoes my arse look big in these trousers?â 
Also, I donât think anyoneâs complaining that the full length avatar exists - just that it canât be switched off when you have the character window open (but you can, amusingly, close the actual information pane).
1 Like
Please (re)-increase spawn rates for myko gas. this is ridiculous and uncalled for. CCP, you want folks in lowsec and nullsec, and now youâre taking away one of the biggest draws to lowsec? WHY? who thought that was a good idea?
Luzia
Yes. yes we do.
3 Likes
The new skill plan User Interface frikking hurt my eyes and brain
3 Likes
You can resize the window to avoid overlapping texts⌠but this issue could be eased if the empty space in the middle of the page would be reduced.
Not quite sure why the game feels Iâve completed something, but am missing a skillbook to complete it.
2 Likes
thank you for sharing what the "silent majority " thinks who play the game but havenât joined to us "the minorities " in this forum thread .
There is work there. I can see ⌠thank you for your effort. Iâm just a someone my gratitude is worthless pretty much but just wanted to share it anyway ⌠
for you : 
2 Likes
I think this is what disheartens most players. CCP ask us to elect a CSM to offer both player and their own knowledge to the devs in the hopes they may make the game both better and more functional than the new buildâs original form. They run it on a test server and ask for feedback. They claim they prowl the internet and these forums looking at feedback and ideas.
Yet, with all this being done, CCP ignores at least a good 95% of it and offers a âfinalâ build that tries to fix something not broken or creates more bugs/issues.
I can understand you, Mike, and the rest of the CSMâs frustration with the current response to your review and suggestions. The players who test on the test server and offer comments feel the same frustration. The remaining players are baffled why and how this got through. Besides a mass exodus or transferring to alpha accounts, what can we players do to get CCPâs attention and reasonable response when all the available ways we have to offer critiques are ignored?
6 Likes
Thatâs a lousy reason to stick with bad design.
Shareholders are not game designers, they are not even game players. They are investors who want a return on their investment. They shouldnât care exactly what CCP spends their time and energy on, as long as they get their profits. They wonât read up on player contentment, nor on the minutiae of what CCP changes in the game.
The only party unwilling to revert bad game design is CCP itself because they have got to the point where they are incapable of owning up to their mistakes.
9 Likes
new checkbox:
I do not care what my character looks like, nor how they dress. In fact, just put a generic âNo Image Availableâ on my profile, and hide all character models from my view, ever.
5 Likes
Thank you for removing the ability to anchor deployables in the starter and career agent systems, but all you really had to do was remove the ability to rename them in order to get rid of the spam.
3 Likes
Have you tried it?
(The answer is no, no you havenât. Otherwise youâd know that it does indeed affect the display on the character sheet.)
1 Like
Exactly my point earlier. @Mike_Azariah - who I respect deeply - is very defensive on this change as it seems to have been his idea. MTUs, or indeed any deployable, are not inherently evil; pointless spam is, however. I am afraid I think Mike offered a hasty and somewhat dumb solution to a genuine problem.
Even better, perhaps, to avoid complaints from people who might rename deployables for legitimate reasons, not spam, would be for the deployables, when launched, to be automatically named, without option, as âVortigern Vitalisâ MTUâ. That way, no complaints from corporations that occasionally use depots for fleet activities as it would be obvious to whom a depot or MTU or secure container belonged.
1 Like
Yeah well, I didnât bother, because the tooltip was pretty clear on what that thing should do.
Another example how CCP canât even get the basic things sorted.
1 Like
HEY ! I am not defensive, your defensive, ya I am fine fine i say . . .
joking, in case you miss the /s
The idea you offered
sounds great until people make alts with the dame damn advertising as character names. And you know some would.
btw it was also frustrating to be unable to cut and paste names of some of the deployables to run them through a translator to even SEE what the hell they said. But that is just me being a curious old guy.
thanks, I do appreciate all the feedback and sorry i could not resist the joke answer . . . honestly I tried.
m
3 Likes
This is the wrong way CCP Give us the old one back plz
(the damn thing makes sounds aswell) 
3 Likes