More industry is done by people who would prefer to fund their PVP through means other than mining and ratting than by High-Sec carebears who the game would be better off without.
I saw that exact paragraph not long ago. Now, when was it? Oh yeah. It was during the blackout.
Only it didnât say highsec. It said null âplayersâ.
1 Like
You may observe from my posts in the AFK cloaking thread that I am in full agreement with the claim that many nullsec players are bot-like farmer trash, if not actual RMT botters. Highsec just seems to have a higher concentration of them and fewer legitimate players to justify its existence.
1 Like
It was true then too.
2 Likes
CCP have said the map changes are permanent before, they are also following up on this by syncing up the permanent changes between tq and serenity so that those changes become part of the common eve online ruleset. I dont see any way they can really undo the changes, it would be like messing with someone sov cause the enemy threw a fit.
1 Like
At best I see Battlecruisers, nothing that would pose a threat to caps.
So are you going to cry and mass rage quit until CCP reverts Niarja?
Put your money where your mouth is. Letâs see you pull a mass rage quit, otherwise your words are empty and meaningless.
2 Likes
News flash folks, The chance to vote was when the system was Invaded.
3 Likes
Sigh 
Yeah but that wasnât a fair vote because more Triglavian voters showed up than Edencom voters, so we demand a do-over! A fair one this time, where everyone casts their votes and then Niarja goes back to high sec.
Except more Edencom supporters were there until the null blocs showed up.
Kybernauts were ahead at the start because they got the ball rolling early.
1 Like
All my fillings are soft.
Whomever keeps posting the Simpsons art should join us in the 21st Century.
So youâre saying more edencom voters were there until more triglavian voters showed up.
You sound very smart.
Well it was really just that the Imperium chased them off at that point.
Turns out Legacy broadcasting that the area is an important strategic location is a bad idea.
I agree, as a Edencomm Supporter i clearly would have wanted the system to become a fortress alas it did not. But to flip it because people do not want to travel or use jump freighters would itself be game breaking in my opinion. The triggs won this battle, lets hope they lose the next one.
3 Likes
Asking for do-overs is what children do.
3 Likes
Itâs sarcasm. Believe me, it really is.
If you knew her, youâd know.
No, donât be a space liberal. Earn your own loots.
Personally I despise N+1 and hive mentality so Iâm not a fan of some massive group showing up, who normally have no interest in it, to sway it in one direction or another.
But itâs one step closer to my âeach faction on its own high sec islandâ dream, so Iâm good with it.
1 Like
As much as I dislike the deeply flawed invasion mechanics I still voted no on this question. EVE is for good and bad completely player driven and the majority just as expected chose to join team âchaosâ and flipped the system.
Now as a part time trader I will probably be hit hard by this but the changes it most likely will bring also feels exciting and might be what actually makes me stick around this time instead of yet again quitting out of boredom.
1 Like