When a major null bloc decided on what they wanted to see happen, hi sec was almost powerless to prevent the outcome. Even if the events occurred on a weekend, I doubt there would have been any change in outcome.
1 Like
Yāall getting punked.
Context, because of removed posts: Darlo was saying that Starship Troopers (the movie) was made by the US military for propaganda purposes.
4 Likes
Removed some off topic posts. Keep it on topic.
It was actually made by a pacifist director who tried to parody the book and ended up making a somewhat enjoyable action flick that got people interested in actually reading the book instead. He himself, of course, didnāt read it, because he was too woke.
From what I know, most of the movie was already shot before they decided to ābase it off ofā Starship Troopers - it had a production name of āBug Huntā and had nothing to do with Heinleinās book.
Anyways, I only edited my post up there because it felt out of place with the preceding discussion deleted. (Removed off topic content. -ISD Dorrim Barstorlode)
1 Like
Removed some posts discussing moderation. Knock it off. First warning.
Exactly, itās like people forgot who actually made Niarja fallā¦
The player loss is setā¦at all costsā¦
Even at the cost CCP has to reset player fortresses and call it āa mistakeā afterwardsā¦
Donāt you think this alone shows the obviousness of CCPās course?
Basicaly you just complain that you lost your home and i bet you didnāt even fight for it.
Go back to the corner instead of coming here with your tears
1 Like
This topic is temporarily closed for at least 4 hours due to a large number of community flags.
This topic was automatically opened after 12 hours.
Players adopt new doctrines for ships that become overused and OP and then CCP nerfs them.
If thatās not CCP undoing player-made changes to their gameā¦
So if the poll on this is an overwhelmingly āNoā. Will OP close the thread and make a new poll?
yet they remain null or low secā¦ bad analogyā¦
Just put it back, no.
Fight to reclaim it, maybe.
Of course if it was Jita, Iād say let it burn.
1 Like
Type the following in a new topic and become enlightened:
TOTALITY STATUS HAVE BEEN REACH https://prntscr.com/updelj
I understood Tat-nuts meaning perfectly. I for one, would have liked the opportunity to re-contest Niarja. Even if doing so required the extensive employment of manpower and resources to achieve. I think that once the major part of highsec was awoken to the threat they would have pushed it back given the opportunity.
Such is the case with Nulsov (as itās alignment can be changed with Entosis) and with FW (which can be changed with plex warfare). I would have liked to have seen something similar with Trig. Invasions. It would have perhaps increased the longevity of the content and made it more enjoyable.
Nopeā¦ The act of sandbox desecration was to bestow finality to the outcome.
I wouldnāt suggest that CCP restore Niarja to HSā¦ I am suggesting that WE should be able to, through the application of effort, in game. There is perhaps a large portion of the playerbase who was either unable to assist EDENCOM during the time of that invasion, or who where unaware of the activity, or itās consequences.
It is not accident that the ranks of EDI, and similarly EDENCOM aligned groups were swollen following this event - and that never again were the Kybernaughts able to contest any subsequent system as easily as they had Niarjaā¦ This in itself speaks volumes about your so-called vote.
1 Like
You would have liked it, but you donāt get everything you want. You lost the first time, you donāt get an extra chance just because you donāt like the first result.
I think that once the major part of highsec was awoken to the threat they would have pushed it back given the opportunity.
And? Whose fault is it that they didnāt bother to think about the consequences up front? Why should being lazy and/or stupid entitle you to extra chances every time you lose?
1 Like