I am not trying to be combative Pedro but what you are saying is reductive at best and at worst flat out dishonest. I can’t be sure if your intention is to troll or if you genuinely don’t understand how STV works as a system. The reason Null gets so many of their people onto the CSM is because the STV system can’t hamstring their efforts if there are no other viable candidates. Having a whose who of who contest between 40 or more people that have no contact info, no campaign thread, no established reputation and no demonstrable capacity to be a CSM is why Null wins. Let me talk about this a different way.
Let’s say hypothetically I want only Goons or only Null leadership on the CSM. If that was the case I would want as many random candidates in the official running as possible. The more the better, do you know why? Because the STV vote system is impacted by the number of seats and the number of candidates. It would not surprise me in the slightest if certain null blocs told their membership to run on alt accounts just to make that number larger. The average non bloc voter is going to be confused and disillusioned either wasting their vote on a decoy candidate or not voting at all. I talk about this in my thread Bitter Pills, you should give it a read as it addresses the questions you have been asking in this campaign thread.
Now as it relates to alpha accounts voting…
Only CCP has metrics on how many alpha accounts exist. It’s not possible to let those accounts vote without opening the entire process to exploitation.