1 Like
Nope, too many dark sided people in game and the real life.
Its boring.
2 Likes
It’s the quiet ones we need to be somewhat worried about!
2 Likes
I have no interest in multi-boxing like that, two accounts were enough for me. So I would do it with friends instead of alts, and then we get to herding cats and all that, so nope, not for me.
Well, I don’t either.
Can we buff ganking so that people are able to gank with less accounts?
Seems ridiculous to require dozens of characters to defeat one freighter.
2 Likes
Freighters are OP.
The game should be about SKILL not ship class and EHP.
A SOLO catalyst should be able to gank a freighter using just SKILL. Requiring 15+ catalysts just to take down one wallet warrior’s freighter is just ridiculous and needs to be addressed.
4 Likes
Also think of the children! Those freighters might be hauling Minmatar child slaves who can’t be liberated before they reach their Amarrian destination because the freighters have too much EHP. This must not be allowed, let good hearted people free the slaves from their terrible demise.
#ThinkOfTheChildren
3 Likes
To eliminate ganking, I propose undocking in a freighter or industrial command ship in high sec and low sec should be a suspect action.
That will eliminate almost all ganking. Also, people will lose a lot less to ganks on average, making it less lucrative. Haulers and miner foremen are encouraged to fleet up or form a convoy. And shell logi/mining alt-corps have diminished value.
As a side effect hauling skill ceiling is raised and Jita market projection diminished. This makes local markets much more valuable and small time industrialists (newbies and vets alike) more competitive. Also, small time piracy is revived in high sec, making the game on the whole more dynamic, interactive, and fun.
Also adding the use of a cargo scanner is a criminal act.
I’d be OK with that if undocking with cargo was also considered a criminal act.
1 Like
I would also support your local market idea as pulling stock out of Jita is not the solution to quicker pvp interactions. Ship hulls and fittings should be available in every NPC station throughout Highsec
Npc corp freighters should be suspect
You recall wrong
So ganking not being a regular thing is your definition of balance if I understand you correctly on this point? You want ganking to go back to being insignificant like back before the destroyer buff?
It’s not emotional, but feel free to project into my responses whatever feeling you like if it gives you pleasure, it doesn’t affect me, so it’s fine.
By making ganking as insignificant as it was before the destroyer buff. You think a MWD for freighters would fix that? What about all the miners that still suffer from the destroyer buff?
God dammit its so simple solution. GANKING IS NECESARY. But there is no counter play. So SOLUTION:
For each 5 players able to set safery red you need one structure in HI SEC space.
SOLVED.
Counter play kill gankers structers. And gankers will actuali learn PVP not just killing VENTURES.
YES VENTURES from statistic 50 000 ventures were GANKED LAST year… im dont care if you are not the one whos doing that but most of you are. There is literary 0 reason to gank newbro ventures.
Easi solution PAY SYSTEM FOR CONCORD you pay 2X price of the enemy ship and you will be able to agress anyting.
So basicli if somebody have nice cargo you make a profit. But if they have a escort they kill you simple.
Concord are an abomination, interfering with Darwin
1 Like
I’d say something cruiser sized with a lot of dmg but really bad tracking. And a bonus to “CONCORD response time +100% per skill level” 
And give the Freighters some highslots for autocannons to make it fair and look very cool \o/
- Citation needed.
- Ventures are elite ships used by veterans and newbies alike, and you cannot prove which is behind the screen.
4 Likes
Somehow none of that is correct. I have an alt in a venture right now that is absolutely doing stuff in hi sec that people should be killing him for. If people were paying attention he would be getting ganked daily. But so many people just don’t pay attention. Or they are like you. Please don’t hurt the poor venture!! He’s just making warp in pings, and dock and undock BMs, and seeing who owns what and where.
What about for gate ganking they have to take control of the underworld network in the sys the more control they have the better bonuses they get to ganking , it’s up to players to wrestle control back.
So a bit like some of the fw mechanics but at the same time letting lazy ass gankers gank as they are now but they get no bonus and eventually we could do something in sys to make it less profitable of them , so pushing them out .
Potential for real wars between gankers and anti-gankers etc