This is the same civilian sought forfeiture against NORAD and NATO, and the UN.
The same powers that be who seek to control with multinational,
trying to make it seem as if the security should not be increased with more mathematic and more science from numbers, including numbers and while those same numbers and other numbers have their integrity attacked as if non-sense from parrots and other Archās animals couples.
I think it should be his problem if he tried to make others not understand it by selling them his lack of understanding as ground to take decisions against security, while trying to divert from the lack of internal actions from their own legal systems against treaties.
Itās also a misrepresentation of fact, and diversion from how they try to alienate from those facts as if it was a legal actions and related to good medical services.
Not surprising your medical service are no longer in (and of) good service to humanity when your best kills them more than it does help them, not when under threat, but, when invested in you.
It has to work though the US court system, but basically in the US the law is you have to surrender assets of a deceased person to the heir(s) upon presentation of a death certificate. Bitcoin is unable to comply. They canāt even tell how much money is involved.
Right, thatās one part.
Also, there is security which is harming the buyer, not only preventing attackers to forfeit the property from courts, which may be sought to be done legally.
ā
So, for me,
the best part is to actually decipher the encryption of the currency,
which is done in ways that are adverse to good sense, law, and also ethics.
Additionally, that does include those who seek to use encryption to create networks to attacks others with by denying them knowledge, and seeking to use force to divert and make them seem as a common nuisance and other turn off terms , such as committing public mischief when they are attacked by their co-workers and courts official, even though that is done against military encryption.
They also claim to use military grade encryption without authority which is not a red flag to me, but,
is someone who is using a flag and who is not authorized,
and ,
who may be misleading the F35 to crash land in some farmerās land with grain Silos or somethingā¦
I say it will eventually capture a big portion of the market valuation, letās say 10 times the market cap of gold. That would result in a 5-6 mil Bitcoin, so 100x from here. This is probably pretty conservative even. That is for stabilizing, this can still take more than a decade.
But anyway, if the lowering of volatility keeps on track, in about ~13-14 years it will be lower than the volatility of USD/EUR
The most hilarious thing about crypto is that literally every few weeks when we have a small correction everyone shits their pants and calls the end of the bull run.
So, they emailed me that,
the rate of the fee for transaction is listed during the transaction.
Summary _ _ _ _ _ USD _ _ BTC
This transaction was first broadcast to the Bitcoin network on April 16, 2021 at 12:43 AM EDT. The transaction currently has 793 confirmations on the network. At the time of this transaction, 0.87352121 BTC was sent with a value of $54,227.81. The current value of this transaction is
now $43,024.91. Learn more about how transactions work.
ā
That was,
for :
0.0005 BTC
(0.00050000 BTC)
0.00015000 BTC was the fee, and,
0.00035000 BTC was transferred with that fee.
However, even in the Blockchain data, those fields specific transaction within the transaction system(s) are not defined, and have to be analyzed after the fact, which my boss the ex-general confirmed to me, how this applied to electronic warfare.
In all good civil terms.
So yes, I do not only have a case against them,
but,
also,
against the courts.
ā
Exodus requires a minimum of
0.0010 BTC for the transaction to dogecoin,
which is 2 times the 0.0005 BTC that I bought.
Additionally,
I was told that the cost was lower when the transaction was larger,
which means that, if I bought like $150 or $100, that it would have cost me less.
So, if
0.00015000 BTC was the fee, and,
I transferred
0.00100000 BTC instead of
0.00050000 BTC , or, 2 times 0.00050000 BTC ,
which 2 times 0.00050000 BTC would be ,
2 times 0.00015000 BTC ,
which would be 0.00030000 BTC in fees,
I would save 0.00015000 BTC on 0.00100000 BTC instead of
0.00050000 BTC .
The same perhaps for
0.00150000 BTC instead of
0.00050000 BTC ,
which may have been the same
0.00015000 BTC fee.
That would leave me with
0.001350000 BTC which is
0.000350000 BTC more than the
0.001000000 BTC required to buy dogecoin.
ā
ā
So, is it cheaper if I sent them like 0.00115 BTC instead of the 0.0005 I sent them?
I am required a minimum of 0.001 BTC to buy dogecoin.
I found other wallets in Canada which are better for me, since the ex-General is a US General.
The thing is, if I did 2 times 0.0005 BTC with a 0.00015 charge,
I would have only only 0.00035 BTC x 2 = 0.0007, and not the 0.001 required.
I would also pay 0.0003 for it.
Furthermore, if I did that 3 times, I would pay 0.00045 in fee,
and would have 0.0007 + 0.00035 = 0.00105.
3 times more expensive for me.
ā
My first transaction was with HoneyBadger Coin for $5 and they then tell me that I canāt get my money if I didnāt have the wallet data, which was lost due to an iPhone hack.
ā
I am still working on it to verify how it went wrong and how, but the courts try to cause the same communication gap, which just canāt work for them, for the same reasons.
I mean, they can try, and they can refuse to prosecute, however, itās against international law.
