I made a simple, easy to use, tool for identifying your wormhole connections by their type. It’s for newbros and vets alike, and since I got a nice feedback so far it’s time to share it here too.
Couple of things needs to be added to be completely done, but I would say this is it. Pretty much all the info provided is verified on grid, whether by me or my fellow wormholers that I trust.
If you see any information that’s missing feel free to hit me up, though I will need a proof or some kind of verification that your info is true (screenshot, log, etc). Tool is being maintained and refreshed constantly to match most recent ingame mechanics that we’re aware of. There are even some things in there I haven’t found anywhere else.
I hope it helps you or your fellow Jspace navigators, feel free to share it anywhere.
Praise Bob!
Thanks for your info. I was assuming the same (that all frigate holes can spawn in all classes + c13), was just waiting confirmation on grid to update the site.
Is that possible to add an function to filter the WH type by the conditions ?
For example, Selecting Class 5 in the “spawn in” section and Class 3 in the “Leads to” then M267 is highlighted etc.
Apparently the WH type can be reverse specified by only one attribute as of now ?
Thank you for the reply.
That function would be pretty much good resources to tell and persuade newbies how those wormhole types are determined by the conditions practically in the game.
Looking forward the updates in the future.
Cool. Thank you for the update.
Btw how do you think an idea to make it distinguishable of wormholes directions in the same conditions ?
( for example, There two wormholes spawns in C5, which leads to C4, M001 and E175. In this case, only E175’s front side only exists in the C5 wormhole. Therefore it seems to be helpful to indicate M001 in C5 is only K162 ( back ) side. etc)
It is a nice tool. However, I have two suggestions:
Maybe it would make sense to use the maximum mass per jump instead of the ships or to put this in brackets after the ship size.
The background is that you can fit through a C1 with the Nestor (which is not taken into account in the tool). The same applies to Heavy Interdictor (depending on the fit) for Small-WHs.
With regard to the K162, something else occurred to me. Wouldn’t it make more sense to refer to the info text of the WH instead of asking to jump through? Since it is also aimed at new players, they would still learn something. In this way, they would probably be more aware of whether the WH is verge of collapse or EOL and perhaps refrain from jumping through.
to update the site.
