Are you actually posting a comment about something being done wrong with a -10.0 player?
You should not post while hanging around in space. Now you just lost another VNI to CODE.
1 Like
Soā¦I can go get another oneā¦big dealā¦pumping fist and drinking your tears.
Why do you continue to validate the need for a 3 minute warp timer by trying to get the thread locked because you fear that CCP might actually notice and implement it?
If this thread was a joke, like you and the others continually say it is, then why validate it with your replies?
The 3min timer was CCPs idea not yours and I can see why you make this thread. You think if they implement it one day you could point out you made this thread with your completely insane arguments. And finally after years of constantly losing and failing at anti-ganking you could make it look like you scored a point against CODE. by crying really hard on the forums.
I never said it was my idea, hence the link to the original video where CCP discusses the 3 minute warp timer.
I donāt need to score points against CODE. Iām certain that the points are already negatively in your favor.
So how many systems in High Sec again does CODE have legal sov over?
And manufacture industry needs minerals which come from ore mined by miners. Hence destruction is good for miners. I simply took your argument one step further.
Yeah, I think other people already addressed the issues with the math skill
Every single one of them. I even have a renter now. One corp is paying me 500mil per month to get full access to a single system.
Wrong, having renters and having a citadel in High Sec is not proof of Sov ownership. But what do you expect from CODE? Any thing less than unaccustomed to reality from CODE would scare the hell out of everyone.
You are just mad because we kicked you out of our territory
You didnāt kick anyone out of any territory because you canāt defend said territory within the scope of a war dec.
Talking about wardecs, can you tell us why exactly you are in that NPC corp?
Because I donāt want to suck the ISK from your corporation when you war dec me and I leave the corporation for administrative matters elsewhere.
I will just leave this here:
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAAH,
sorry, but did you just admit that you would corp hop in case of war dec?
why not fight in war?
1 Like
Back on topic or I will flag your comments as spam.
Now why does CODE think that Bump Tackling isnāt the same end result as using a Warp Scrambler?
Because you can still warp
1 Like
How can a freighter warp out when it is being Bump Tackled?
The only way that a freighter can warp out during a Bump Tackle is if the Bumping ship stops the Bumping allowing the freighter to align and then warp out.
The only way that a freighter can warp out during a High Sec Warp Scramble from a ganker is when CONCORD destroys the scrambler ship.
In either case the freighter is not able to warp out before being ganked unless the gankers decide to not gank it.
The thread however is not about gankers deciding to gank a target or not.
The thread is about the use of Bump Tackling to keep a ship from warping while positioning the ship off of the grid of the sentry guns so that the ganker fleet will incur less damage when it comes to gank the freighter.
If he warps to an object or ship in the direction he gets bumped. He can for example send an interceptor into that direction and then warp to him
1 Like
Here is the catch: it has to align with the error of no more than 5deg (or so) - but bumping may actually align freighter with SOMETHING [station? citadel? planet? asteroid belt? matters not] and then freighter can warp to there. Sure you might have wanted to cross the system and reach other gate but instead you warped somewhereā¦
Wrong, not even a good try. Bumping Tackling a freighter has a 100% chance of sending the freighter in a direction that would still not allow it too warp out due to the alignment time.
Not even close to being on the table of a good try.