You’re the one who insists that even though they have more territory, numbers, and industrial output, in a war of aggression where they’d have shorter supply lines and their allies’ assistance, we’d be able to win. You’re saying the Republic can take on the Empire and the State, successfully, without the Federation. If we’re on our own, they are already unstoppable.
That’s the whole point of the alliance with the Federation. The simple fact that it endures through all of the crap both sides have put it through should be a pretty solid indicator that you’re wrong. It’s you who wants to guarantee our extinction, even if you’re too bullheaded to see it.
Funny thing about war, Miz: until it starts, you retain the option to start one. Once you do, you can’t really say ‘oops, do-over’ so easily. I’ve already told you what I think we should be doing: looking for a way to change the strategic situation, to alter the basic math of the conflict before we start it.
At the very least, we should stop turning a blind eye, officially, to the continued Imperial Navy raiding operations in the Republic. Start taking those ships intact, and force squadron commander after squadron commander to publicly admit what they were doing, and where those orders came from. Make it clear that the Republic considers that raiding an act of war, and lobby the State to acknowledge that those raids constitute initial aggression by the Empire—that they’re under no obligation to render aid. Assure them as best we can that we’ll keep the Feds from trying to fully retake Luminaire, or initiating wider hostilities. Feck, we’ve got reason enough to stand together against either of the expansionist powers.
And then, once the groundwork’s been laid for a fight we can win… then the next time one of those golden pigs so much as buys a collar in a pet store in the Republic, we burn them all to the ground. But none of that’s been done. None of it. And without it, no, we can’t win that fight. We can’t take on half the cluster by ourselves.