An expensive process, yes, but calling it a questionable one is … well, it sure is something.
I’ll give you the fact that the way some of the supply of bodies for it is obtained is certainly questionable, but that’s not inherent to the process.
Of course, medical treatment that is only easily available to the rich is questionable in that aspect, but this is hinting at it being made more widely available, so … less questionable, I guess?
But it is true we do not know Upwell’s solution to the problems causing the expense, of course, if they even have one or simply think they can profit even with existing costs somehow (though I do doubt that, it does seem likely they have some way of cutting costs, be it revolutionary or not).
It is a bit curious that the advertisement shows standardized bodies, I suppose that might appeal to some but does seem less likely to have mass appeal except for the desperate, so I am curious if this is some requirement of the technology and they were being uncharacteristically honest, or if it was some odd artistic choice on their part, or what.
I can attest from personal experience that living in a body that does not match one’s feeling of what one’s body should be is a very uncomfortable experience for most people, which as mentioned non-desperate people would probably be unlikely to willingly choose, of course, corporations preying upon the desperate is nothing new. But many people learn to live with many things, of course, and different aspects of how one’s body is can be more or less important to different people. So we shall see, I suppose.
Your comment about bodymodding is misleading, though. Overwhelmingly, bodymodding as a means of self-expression in nearly all forms – of which cloning can serve as one – assists in making people feel more comfortable with their bodies or able to properly express their identity or inner selves, and thus provides a source of stability.