Yep. you did shift them.
All I did was point out your error and you shifted them.
Twice
1 Like
The error in thinking is on your part. There is little value in comparing arbitrarily chosen points on a line graph.
1 Like
Its about perspective. Zoom in enough and it looks flat, but it aināt.
1 Like
Arbitrarily chosen perspectives. I can arbitrarily choose 2004 and say weāre doing great. See how that works?
1 Like
If you chose 2004 it wouldnāt be arbitraryā¦
Changes like this that drive people out of certain economic niches, and out of the game for some, add up. Every pilot missing is one less producer, seller, targetā¦ They need to be drawing people in, not pushing them out.
1 Like
It is. I just chose it to support a narrative, just like you guys are. Your perspective needs to be expansive, not myopic. I guess you missed my point. Your mind appears to be made up and not open to disconfirming evidence. Bad scientist is bad.
Dude, a five year span leading to the present is not arbitrary. It highlights a standing trend. Using 2004 is not arbitrary either, itās intentionally deceptive.
Arbitrary:
based on random choice or personal whim, rather than any reason or system.
1 Like
Right, exactly. Your guys personal whim to choose this time period or that time period to paint a picture of doom and gloom. Duurr
I think the current number of players is better than too few, or even worse too many.
1 Like
But choosing a certain period and stating āAlready Reboundingā is ok?
You chose a 5 month period to show a āsummer breakā and claimed average online was improving, yet looking at the numbers over 2 week periods the numbers are DOWN.
You chose an inaccurate period to make a point and got called on it. Accept you were wrong and get over it.
You must have trouble following conversations, or youāre being dishonest. Kind of hard to assume good faith on your part, so Iām gonna go with ābeing dishonestā. I was responding to an arbitrarily selected portion of the PCU graph with more recent, disconfirming evidence. Thereās nothing wrong with that; it was contextually relevant. Then the goalpost shifted to ā5 months agoā an then you shifted it to ā5 years agoā. Shift shift shift. Gotta hold up that narrative.
Youāre being dishonest and manipulating the data in a dishonest way. Shame on you.
No, I didnāt. That was the other guy. Stop lying.
It is in relation to what I was responding to. Be honest and keep things in context.
Arbitrarily selected portion to support a narrative. Yawn. First it was ā5 months agoā, then it was ā5 years agoā, and now itās ālook at this random 2 week periodā. Jesus dude, just take your L with grace.
1 Like
Ok. so the US has summers that last 5 months, so your original post about numbers rebounding based on your 5 month summer was accurate. But then for the month proceeding your 5 month summer, numbers actually dropped but Iām the one being dishonest.
EveOffline is ONLY accurate when you use it.
Got it. Iām dishonest because I used the same available information as you to show you were not right.
Get over yourself, you got it wrong and got called out. Boo Hoo.
1 Like
What I dont understand is why if you dislike CCPs decisions so much you are so invested in wanting to improve their bank.
1 Like
lolwhat? No, my dude, no no no. lmao
Summer is 3 months long, comprised of the months June, July, and August.
Keep lying and twisting instead of taking your L with grace.
1 Like
Derailed thread is derailed.
Industry changes still bad. There, back on topic.
3 Likes
So why then did you include May and September in your āIt was Summer my dudeā, āalready reboundingā post?
Your summer (my winter) shows 21k average, yet since then the average to date has dropped to 20k. Where is the rebound you stated?
And Iām the one lying and twisting.
Not sure how pointing out a blatant posting error by Xuixien points to me not liking CCP decisions or shows I am invested in improving their bank.
Seems to me youāre injecting your own narrative here.
For context and comparison.
On the image I posted.
Yes.
And here I thought we were all back on topic. aww, shucks.
1 Like
Ypu have repeatedly stated your objections to their decisions on numerous topics, not least Scarcity and now Downtime asteroid regeneration.
Now you are arguing that the player numbers are dying.
Whats wrong with you that you seem to have forgotten these things because you want an argument?
2 Likes
Hello,
Iām certainly not the first player to pass this on to you, but having been a titan producer before the industry changes, I had fun calculating the basic resource requirements for producing an Avatar today. Here is what I found:
Isogen 140342600
Megacyte 3710580
Mexallon 492442200
Morphite 15000
Nocxium 16235600
Pyerite 1731447200
Tritanium 493820000
Zydrine 7205155
Helium Fuel Block 154075
Hydrogen Fuel Block 156745
Nitrogen Fuel Block 155595
Oxygen Fuel Block 178390
Atmospheric Gases 16015500
Cadmium 21100
Caesium 14800
Dysprosium 6300
Evaporite Deposits 5350100
Hydrocarbon 16018900
Mercury 68800
Neodymium 6300
Platinum 75900
Promethium 68800
Silicates 5353500
Technetium 8400
Thulium 6300
Tungsten 67500
Vanadium 8600
Fullerite- C28 488800
Fullerite-C32 468800
Fullerite-C50 211800
Fullerite-C60 311900
Fullerite-C70 487100
Fullerite-C72 266500
Fullerite-C84 420200
Fullerite-C320 156300
Fullerite-C540 175000
Bacteria 400000
Biocells 5000
Broadcast Node 5580
Chiral Structure 1000000
Gel-Matrix Biopaste 10000
Hermetic Membranes 3500
Integrity Response Drones 10448
Miniature Electronics 20000
Nanite 5000
Nano-Factory 5560
Organic Mortar Applicators 4000
Oxygen 500000
Protein 200000
Recursive Computing Module 750
Self-Harmonizing Power Core 8600
Sterile Conduits 2224
Synthetic Synapses 4000
Test Cultures 5000
Water 25375000
Wetware Mainframe 5936
Amber Mykoserocin 3200
Azure Mykoserocin 3200
Celadon Mykoserocin 3200
Golden Mykoserocin 3200
Lime Cytoserocin 500
Lime Mykoserocin 43200
Malachite Cytoserocin 500
Malachite Mykoserocin 43200
Vermillion Mykoserocin 3200
Viridian Mykoserocin 3200
AG-Composite Molecular Condenser 80
AV-Composite Molecular Condenser 80
Counter-Subversion Sensor Array 10
CV-Composite Molecular Condenser 80
Enhanced Electro-Neural Signaller 10
Isotropic Deposition Guide 750
LM-Composite Molecular Condenser 1130
Meta-molecular Combiner 10
Nano Regulation Gate 25
Nanoscale Filter Plate 10
Based on the market, thatās 750b for an Avatar (and there arenāt enough resources on the market). Is this really what CCP wants? 
4 Likes