@Ethan02 I am not a UI expert either, I do appreciate that the site has had a hell of a lot of work on it and gives a ton of info, i do find it complicated but i didnt want you to think I do not appreciate the work that has been involved.
After reading the article from @Rhivre on INN on the MER I really liked the comparison tables in there.
Thus I âborrowedâ this and added it as a feature in the MER section of A4E. (Thanks Rhivre 
)
MER metric comparison of two timeframes across all regions (link)
You selected two timeframes and a metric and the page compares the values of these timeframes against each other.
And this doesnât need to be a single month. If you select several month, then the average across these months will be calculated and used in the comparison. And you can mix that, thus compare a timeframe to a single month (as seen in the screenshot above).
Of course you can select all the MER metrics that are provided by CCP in the regional stats.
As always, eager to get feedback or further suggestions. If you think that Adam4EVE is useful you can consider to support it via Patreon .
If found a bug in your reprocessing calculations:
When processing 100 Mercoxit it results in 15,000 Morphite instead of the correct 150.
1 Like
Good catch, it doesnât seem to take into account that the batch size for the 300 returned Morphite at 100% is 100 and not 1.
Added as a bug and will look into it.
Thanks for reporting!
Thanks for all your work!
1 Like
Note that in the detail page, youâve swapped labels âbuy priceâ and âsell priceâ. Right? Or am I having a stroke? And check the volume tooâŚ
- https://www.adam4eve.eu/commodity.php?region=10000002&typeID=34
- https://www.adam4eve.eu/mer_region_stats.php, needs a list box instead of a search box for region selecting.
Thanks for the feedback.
Regarding your first point: It might seem like it is swapped, because shouldnât be the sell price always higher than the buy price? However if you check the current market orders for tritanium on a region level (as per your example), then indeed there is a higher buy order than sell order. Thus the values are correctly displaying the highest buy and lowest sell order in the region.
If you select Jita exclusively then youâll have the expected picture:
https://www.adam4eve.eu/commodity.php?typeID=34&stationID=60003760
Regarding the second point: Easy to add a list of the regions to select the needed one. Added it as a feature request.
Apologies!
No need for an apology. Iâm glad to hear feedback and its good to check, if the site is still working correctly.
1 Like
Youâre too kind. I wasted your time. Uhm. do you know something about this: Discrepancy in some MERs
The PI chain information is super confusing and there needs to be some way to block information from before a certain point from calculation. having this massive negative on P4 production in comparison to selling the P0 makes it very confusing because it looks like itâs implying that most things you build itâs better just extracting and exporting the P0. Once understood what each step means it seems like some of the displayed information is only applicable on single-planet chains, despite the system making it possible to utilize multiple.
Thanks for the feedback.
Not sure though what is throwing you off. Could you please make an example/screenshots?
For me the profitability of the chain against selling the P0s seems to be clearly indicated.
(Hovering over the icons in the chain shows a tooltip as seen below)
After spending a LOT more time with the tool: I love it from the direction that it is designed from (determining what you want to put on a planet).
The math feels weird for, say youâre buying the Condensates to make Organic Mortar Applicators then suddenly, despite the fact that youâre making profit on that step, itâs negative profit compared to P0 and negative profit compared to inputs. That last one is ludicrously confusing and sussing it out more properly is difficult since unchecking one âbuy thisâ tickbox unchecks them all (bug, if just on firefox).
From what Iâm able to tell the buying from market button doesnât remove the P0 that would go into that item from further calculations, so it mutzes with Profit Compared to P0 down the line. The assumption from most users would likely be that if theyâre buying something from the market itâs because theyâre not in a position to produce it themselves and thereâs not loss on the production because itâs easily assumable that doesnât mean one just isnât harvesting something else with their free PG.
Also itâs not explicitly told to the player whether itâs calculating based on moving each new step to a new planet or if thereâs somewhere to tell the calculator that somethingâs going to another planet and to calculate import and export taxes.
Not sure if the listing of âTrade Hubsâ is automatically generated or hand picked, but consider the SiCO Trade Center if it is the latter, as its rather large Iâd say. 1,411 sell orders
Hi there,
the market hub list is auto-generated based on the public available data gathered via the API. And thus the mentioned Fortizar is also listed, currently as number 50.
You might need to change the number of rows displayed in the filters.
Did this answer your question?
Trade History on a Item
I am not sure if this is broken or it only updates in long periods. When I view the trade history of any item, the last pull was from the 3rd of this month.
My apologies is this is normal. 
Hi there,
no that is not normal. Unfortunately the cron job responsible for this was stuck since the 3rd. I noticed it only yesterday and corrected it. Thus new data should be captured again. Unfortunately the gap wonât be filled. 
Thanks for pointing this out and sorry for the issue. 
Will there be a Dark theme coming anytime soon� At late times of the day the brightness can scorch the eyes