Think your overlooking something, every keepstar has at least one major alliance backing it, at least in high sec. most have multiple alliances backing them.
Good try though!
And if a non-NS group were to try and start building supers/titians, what do you think might happen?
Keep in mind that the āno aggression agreementā you mentioned earlier would be threatened by that 3rd partyā¦
Good try though!
JFC, are you even bothering to read what I wrote? Thereās a reason I listed two possibilities for each station: be part of an existing major nullsec power, or be destroyed. Farmer trash like ICANP will not be part of an existing major nullsec power and will be destroyed if they try to build supercapitals.
The non agression agreement would most likely stand, with support from test, pandemic, and frat to name a few, however those individual alliances that make up the corp would have the liberty of engaging any āthreatsā, as they have had the liberty of doing that long before you entered the chat
Can you remind me when we said we were gonna build a super capital shipyard?
Because i dont recall anybody askingā¦?
As a highsec group you wonāt even get to fly capitals, let alone build supers. So no need to ask really.
I hope Sabus wins EVE. That would be a win-win for everyone.
Your request is simply - lowsec and nullsec have capitals, so highsec should too.
That is the foundation yes, you keep trying to attack the argument when I mention that lowsec and nullsec both have capital access, even though they are different. Then deflect.
Capitals should be in highsec, they were before, and the reason they were removed no longer applies. Thus they should be added again, for the betterment of the game and of highsec.
Which means that you folks would be debris PDQā¦unless you hid in NPC stationsā¦oh wait, you are also asking for that now tooā¦never mind.
As a highsec group you wonāt even get to fly capitals, let alone build supers. So no need to ask really.
Well the point of this thread is so that we can fly capitals.
Also remember, highsec mechanics donāt allow you to just shoot willy nilly. If safety is green I donāt see how everyone will be ādebris.ā
Becasue if you canāt build in NPC stations then that station can be WDāedā¦and destroyed in short order. Thatās why you folks also want to be able to build in NPC stationsā¦
More slippery slopesā¦
No need to attack that. Itās a true statement.
Having them in highsec is never going to happen so cry all you like. Write to CSM members all you like. Spam evemails all you like.
CCP arenāt going to change the current restrictions and yes, the reason for implementing cyno inhibition across highsec and moving many capitals out to low and null in the first place is just as valid now as it was then.
Your idiot CEOās supposed point here is to build up a supercapital fleet and challenge the nullsec powers. In his own words:
(Of course we know the reality is that you are correct, he isnāt going to do any of that, he just wants to buy a highsec farming ship that canāt be suicide ganked.)
2 Likes
Lmfao this guy actually took āinvading nullsecā seriously. And if we wanted to stockpile capitals we could do so easily, you dont have to build a capital to buy it.
Good effort though!
Excellent, thank you for admitting that your CEO is lying about his supposed desire to invade nullsec and is just using that as an excuse to demand highsec buffs. Iām screenshotting this for future use.
(We all knew he was lying, but now I have proof I can throw at him every time he says it.)
2 Likes
Well not exactly. Itās certainly on our list of objectives, but its kinda far down there atm, so its not taken as seriously as say, putting a foothold in syndicate or something like that
2 Likes
Soccer fan huh lmao
1 Like