My pointing out this obvious problem shouldn’t offend you. This is what you do in rational discourse. I was polite and didn’t say anything offensive nor do I think you’re idiots, I just think you’re wrong.
Why has this stopped? I mean since the advent of electronic recording devices, has anybody been able to get recordings of their respective deities, let alone the Amarr and their god?
Are you saying their evidence is their book, or is in it? Has that evidence ever been independently verified by third parties? How do we know that the Amarrian accounts are true?
Oh good then you should have no problem proving it to a doubting, non Amarrian like me. Or perhaps believing requires slavery to either condition my mind to accept what my reason won’t without good evidence, or at least get valuable labour out of even if I don’t?
Asking for evidence for extraordinary claims isn’t primative thinking, its the basis of scientific inquiry. You know, the way us primative screwheads reached the stars independently of the Amarr and had interstellar nations before they even met us.
I don’t care, this speaks nothing to the god claim.
You’re repeating a fallacy called known as Appeal to Ancient Wisdom to support the Amarrian culture and achievements while simultaneously writing off scientific inquiry as ancient wisdom. The mental gymnastics involved are astounding and yet we still see no verifiable evidence of the Amarrian god.
The fact that the Jove are dying of in no way validates Amarrian claims or their god beliefs. Tying the two together like that is disingenuous, no matter how knowledgeable you might be on the Jove.
Surround yourself with people who think the same, already believe the same things and reinforce these beliefs no matter what. Sounds like an echo chamber.
Every time, when people have written some phenomenon off as magic, science has shown us it isn’t, even showing that the reality is more amazing than our magic make believe.
There have been discoveries of new physics throughout the history of science. No scientist, worthy of being a scientist, would say that science knows all there is to know. If we knew everything there’d be no need for science.
Conjecture, and the Amarrian god is in the same boat until you can demonstrate otherwise. Be it pantheism, monotheism or deism they all currently lack in the evidence department. And you’ve yet to bring any to the table either just more claims and conjecture.
You’d reject a deistic god because you are more comfortable with a personal god, or at least a god more personal than the Amarrian god. That’s nice, it doesn’t prove anything, or bring evidence of a god to the table though. It does sound like an admission that your belief in a god is more to satisfy some emotional need then any active pursuit of truth or knowledge.