You have that backwards. Nothing is an exploit UNTIL CCP declare it so. People need to bug report / raise a support ticket in order to get CCP to make a decision one way or the other.
Players cannot say something is an exploit, only CCP can.
You have that backwards. Nothing is an exploit UNTIL CCP declare it so. People need to bug report / raise a support ticket in order to get CCP to make a decision one way or the other.
Players cannot say something is an exploit, only CCP can.
And they WILLâŚiâm absolutely sure about thisâŚ
So why using something that is the definition of an exploit as long as possible KNOWING that it is one?
Thatâs not polite at bestâŚ
You could forbid yourself using it out of beeing reasonableâŚhard for some but still the right thing to do
Not sure if serious?
Why? because this is Eve and that is how it is played, hell everything competitive is gamed, thats just human nature. To win you have to push the edges of the rules.
He only appears to think, if we can call it that, in black and white; any shade of grey is inconceivable to him.
What are you going on about?
I donât think he even knows himself, itâs just another off kilter and meaningless rant from Traco/Balos; who, judging by his posts, doesnât appear to understand the game anyway
Anxiplex are fine but it should not be linked to sov, it would be nice if anyone can place them anywhere to make it fair to both offence and defence + npc null / lowsec.
Roamâs take very very long and if groups can place gateâs leading into your space then it makes the trip more bearable to them and also it gives you a reason to go out and shoot the gates creating more pvp opportunities and eve can never have too many reasons to go shoot something or someone.
No you have to OBEY to the rulesâŚthis is no anarchyâŚccp will teach you if had to,
Maybe you should simply shut up?
This stakling of other opinions you do continiously is not showing any kind of reasonâŚyou justâŚtrying to bite away opinions you donât like which is very mature indeedâŚ
Devaluing is not the way to goâŚbut i believe you have no other arrow than that right?
Just taunting and spitting out your foul spoilsâŚ
Maybe you should take your own advice; as the saying goes itâs better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak and remove all doubt.
This stakling of other opinions you do continiously
Stalking continuously? Paranoid much? Iâm not stalking you, let alone continuously. Iâm making fun of you.
is not showing any kind of reasonâŚyou justâŚtrying to bite away opinions you donât like which is very mature indeedâŚ
Youâve apparently learned the difference between opinion and fact, congratulations. I disagree with your opinions, you have that much right; pointing out why I disagree is more mature than your approach, which primarily consists of a childish âIâm always rightâ.
Devaluing is not the way to goâŚbut i believe you have no other arrow than that right?
Value is subjective, in my opinion the majority of your posts have little merit or value.
Just taunting and spitting out your foul spoilsâŚ
Wat�
As i saidâŚpatheticâŚ
You really donât like people pointing out your foibles and challenging your views, do you?
You should stick to your own personal little bubble, where nobody disagrees with you.
There are no rules to obey at this time. Currently there are NO rules that say you cannot use warp disruption bubbles to catch and hold npc ships.
Until CCP make a rule to prevent that it is perfectly legal and fair.
Good luck with that argument, heâs a bit of a totalitarian who seems to believe that everything should be forbidden unless the rules allow it.
There arenât âfairâ rules regarding an exploitâŚusing it simply leads to bansâŚ
And the âargumentâ that there âis no rulebreaking until ccp SAYS it isâ is a joke right?
This is like saying a bank robbery is no crime until you are caughtâŚyou know itâs wrong but if nobody sees it itâs right?
Really?
I mean REALLY???
The opposite is rightâŚit is WRONG,it is an exploit,you know it and all âargumentsâ you have are just excuses and justifications and have just ONE meaning : to declare an obviously wrong behavior legalâŚ
But itâs just legal in YOUR eyes,inside YOUR reality bubbleâŚit still is wrong in the real worldâŚ
Iâm almost 100% sure that this is referred to as âemergent game playâ, which is one of those things CCP likes to see (settlement of WHs for e.g.).
Thanks.
LOL, no, iâm pretty sure it is anarchy, in space! Which is what makes it fun⌠i canât run about in the real world blowing up spaceships at random
Also, you do not have to obey the rules⌠sure itâs nice when everyone does but there isnât anything to ensure you do. For RL examples of this I direct your gaze towards the drug cartels that are off doing their own thing.
LOL, no, not at all. Because bank robbery is already a crime (at least where I am). It is more like if you were selling tacos for a living, and someone really doesnât like tacos, so they insist you shutdown your operation because they feel tacos are evil and wrong. (Iâm not saying they are, it is simply the opinion of one imaginary being).
But this isnât the real world, itâs an internet spaceship game?
Regards,
Cypr3ss.
Offence and defense should never be âfairâ. Because kills reasons to actually take and defend place you call âhomeâ. And without this concept EvE becomes Counter-Strike in space.
Nope, you can only be banned after something is declared an exploit.
Wrong again, that is how the game works. You cannot break the rules if there are no rules. Until CCP make a rule that says âYou cannot do Xâ, then X can be done / used by everyone.
Stop trying to use Real World examples inside a game world, or do you want everyone to stop playing Call of Duty or Fortnite because murder is against the law.
How is an exaggeration a useful design input?
Itâs when you disagree with someone more that once