Donât leave yet, I want an explanation for your hypocrisy.
Very true.
So, Makoto, maybe you can clear this up: when flying in an ARC fleet [EDIT: Actually, let me clean this up a little.]
- Are contractors expected to adhere to any particular standards of behavior, or would (for example) ganking and attacking other capsuleers on a whim be tolerated?
- Is the fleet considered to be representing ARCâs interests?
a. If so, is the fleet considered to be representative of ARC to others in local, or is it just an unruly mob who happen to be shooting the right things? - Is the FC considered to be ARCâs representative and agent to the fleet?
- Are fleet members considered to be the FCâs responsibility?
You have way too much confidence in CONCORD.
Like, try a bit of free thinking, man
I donât trust them at all, but honestly, if something had the ability to take down everything, specifically them, woupd they just sit on their hands? No, they will send out agents, they will kill anything and everything if it threatened them personally, which is the kind of threat that ARC says the drifters are. Look at what they did to sansha kuvekei back in the day. They got all of the empires together and wiped them out
Well, thatâs actually a really bad metric, considering we know that when the Drifters did attack CONCORD right in their home freaking station, CONCORDâs response was⌠cave, give them what they blatantly wanted (the Drifter corpse) and insist they werenât getting involved.
I mean, really, Iâd more take my cue from the Navies. CONCORDâs got about as many balls as a convention of neutered pets.
Watch, as I destroy your entire argument with a single word!
Elders.
Woodrow Ormand has, also, accused us of Drifter genocide, which is an entertaining notion, so consider whose comments youâre basing this off of.
That said, to the questions.
- Pilots on ARC fleets are generally expected to follow fleet commander instructions. Failure to follow instructions can warrant response as appropriate. We honestly havenât run into major issues, so thereâs no formal policy here.
- âRepresentingâ is a loaded term. As you well know, we tend to be a fairly open community, and accept volunteers from all corners. We do not filter volunteers based on political orthodoxy, because generally ARC seeks to be apolitical and multinational in nature.
a. As above, so below. Policing speech in local is not normally a priority for fleet commanders, excepting when particularly egregious. If we receive complaints, weâll address it as appropriate. - Generally, yes.
- Generally, yes.
In this instance, Woodrow Ormand is a particularly outspoken party who seems to believe that not awaiting direct CONCORD instruction to engage Drifters could be considered an usurpation of CONCORD authority, and that ARC is engaged in genocide.
So, really, argue what youâd like, and Iâll be over here with popcorn.
Exactly, and why donât you call for wiping out the entire minmatar people wherever you see them I wonder? They did the exact same thing to concord as the drifters did to the amarr
Itâs really not. Itâs a pretty simple question: When your fleet is active in a system, do you want people to look upon your actions as something ARC receives credit for, and thus held responsible for, or just something you happen to be along for the ride over?
Yeah. Definitely gotta give you that one. Anyone claiming CONCORD got the Empires together to wipe out the Sansha⌠uhmâŚ
What I meant was that they thought they did. They burned everything down and for all intents and purposes, they killed them all. That was their intent. They didnât stop, they simply overlooked a few hiding places
Is this real life? I am Minmatar you blithering idiot.
As for the âexact same thingâ, it really wasnât. The Elders communicated their intentions well in advance. They even gave a nice little flyby to prove they could do it. They asked CONCORD very nicely to stand down while they rescued slaves from the Amarr.
In return, CONCORD, the clusters biggest paper slaver hound, sat on their police-y arses and did â â â â all.
So when the Elders showed up and did exactly what they warned they would, whoâs fault is it if CONCORD were surprised and useless? Despite their incompetence, the were back up and running 24 hours later with seemingly no ill effects.
In comparison, the Drifters showed up, no communication, and assassinated a head of state.
I made the analogy because I knew it would get your attention. Because they communicated first do you think it makes you that much different? They were going to do it regardless of what concord thought. Same as the drifters, the only difference was they told concord. The drifters had a singular goal, and they accomplished it without any more bloodshed than was necessary. Would it have made it any better if the drifters said, hey, we are going to kill the empress regardless of what you think, and then they do it. Would it be much different?
Yup. The Elders undertook actions designed to be as much agitprop and PR as they were a military campaign. The Drifters didnât care about the PR and just hit their objective. I mean, I know weâve been throwing around the âassassinationâ word a lot, but⌠assassinations are generally held to not be legitimate military targets. As the ultimate head of the Imperial Navy, and more importantly, while piloting a titan, I donât really think you can say Jamyl I wasnât a legitimate military target. As a capsuleer, even her pod can be seen as one.
So was it really an assassination, or just a precision strike at enemy command and control capabilities?
Yes!
It shows theyâre willing to communicate, it shows they are at least vaguely human, it shows that they can potentially be negotiated with, it potentially offers insight into why they did it, it gives time to prepare a military response, etcetera, etcetera, etcetera.
Even if the end result was identical, there is no scenario in which it wouldnât have been an improvement on what did happen.
We know theyâre willing to communicate when it serves their purposes. They have.
With no official conflict declared? Thatâs an assassination.