Balancing Hi-Sec Freighter Bump Mechanics

Here’s what I wrote:

In some cases it’s upwards of 20 characters to gank them.

Read the first 3 words.

Now, you did in fact write that 6 is all that’s needed. Here, I’ll quote you too:

To gank a freighter, you need 6.

This is not a true statement. There are lots of examples where 6 is insufficient by a long way, and where to gank a Mach is much less than the requirement to gank a freighter. It’s not absolute in any of the cases. Depends on how the freighter is tanked.

A well tanked freighter is far harder to gank than a bump Macharial, but a poorly tanked one is about the same. In all cases, the bump Mach is just as engageable as any freighter is and it takes fewer ships to gank a bump Mach.

Yes, that is what I wrote. Supplemented with an example of a freighter where 6 is more than you need. Since all freighters with 3 cargo expanders have the same or even lower EHP than the example, 6 is all you need to gank those. Not to mention that some even fit nanofibers, which reduce EHP even more, which means that competent gankers need even fewer pilots. Incompetent gankers, on the other hand, need way more pilots than 6, that’s a given.

While this is true, you do not need 20 pilots to gank a tanked freighter. With the only exception when someone reparis it, but that’s proper counterplay used against ganking and should result in more necessary effort by gankers.

Except that isn’t an example of a fully tanked freighter being ganked by 6 ships. There’s 10 talos and 1 catalyst.

Where is it just 6 ships to gank it?

In the same post. Click on the Up Arrow and look at the links. I provided the examples in my post. I am not going to do your work when you just need to scroll up.

Furthermore, I also did not say you need 6 to gank a tanked freighter. I said you need 6 to gank a sufficiently prepared freighter. And no more than 11 to gank a tanked freighter. Please stop distorting my posts so that they suit your narrative.

There is no link of a fully tanked freighter being ganked by 6 gankers. None.

So it doesn’t matter how many times I go up and click the links, the number of gankers isn’t going to change.

Then maybe you should burst your bubble and read what I wrote and linked in my long post. You will not find me saying you need 6 to gank a tanked freighter. If you cannot shake of the web of lies that you wove yourself, I cannot help you.

Of course not. I linked a kill where 6 pilots killed a sufficiently prepared freighter, just as I said, and I linked a kill where 11 pilots killed a fully tanked freighter, just as I said to disprove your claim you need “massive fleets” or more than 20 pilots. Never have I said you need 6 to gank a tanked freighter.

However: You can even destroy fully tanked freighters with just 1 character. :smiley:

I’m not sure where you get this hate-bone for suicide ganking, but the numbers are well-known and public:

Recently, ganks take between 10-33 characters with the median somwhere around 20-25. And that ignores the support characters that don’t show up on killmails.

No matter how you slice it, that is a huge amount of effort to go to attack an industrial ship. I see no reason why that number should be made higher by forcing gankers to use high-alpha ships and tags. Typically only a handful of these EHP monsters die each day as it is.

If perma-bumping is really an issue then there are ways to add costs or more effort to bumping that will still allow a criminal fleet to operate, but limit these apocryphal hours-long bumping sessions. However, I really am not convinced that it is an issue of any relevance or importance.

I am sure though that giving freighters a get-out-of-PvP button as proposed in the OP isn’t a good idea. They are safe enough as it is.

And yet:

Speaks for itself right?

What speaks for itself? Your screenshot shows only that I am right.

Wow, a non-gank (as in suicide gank in the context of what we are discussing).

Gee. Awesome example. Even with the smiley that’s pretty dumb.

This number is total bogus. CODE inflates the numbers by using way more characters than necessary to gank a freighter. I have shown this as well in my post. Of course they do this inflation so that arguments like your’s work. The killboard clearly shows, however, that you do not need that many characters to gank a freighter.

1 Like

They show you claiming you could provide a link to a gank of a fully tanked freighter that was killed by 6 gankers. Yet the killmail linked doesn’t contain that at all.

/r/quityourbullshit is where that belongs

Sorry for that, but I could not contain myself from lowering my standards of argumentation to your standards. Won’t happen again, promise.

Give yourself more credit. You do it all the time. It’s all good.

No, it does not show that. It shows that I never said something about that you need 6 pilots to gank a freighter and that I only said you need much fewer people than the 20 that you claim.

You are kidding right:

Do you see anywhere in those quotes the word “tanked”? I do not. :slight_smile:

Nor do I see it in the post where you said you never said it.

To quote myself from the original posts:

May I suggest that you stop ridiculing yourself? You have already succeeded in swamping my long and elaborate posts out of view from most people who will ever read this thread with your spam. You achieved your goal, haven’t you?

Where did I ever write that a massive fleet is required?

As long as people realise there is a counter argument to the constant tears you cry in the forum, then yes.

There was a quite reasonable discussion occuring until you spewed your salt all over the place.