Bring Back Singularity! :parrotdad: POLL

I was in a game with a test server like this and they too removed the server access. I suspect the reason for removing, might have been more players started using it over the actual server. On that game server, the test server allowed god-like mode at a fraction of the cost.

I never played here on singularity.

Have fun!

1 Like

while titans, still had to be built, everything on the market seeded by ccp was 100isk even PLEX.

1 Like

Your skills are the same, unless you’re awarded extra by CCP for participating in a Test Server “Event”.

Up to 5 million.

It’s their flagship, if they need feedback on how content is from players.
Are players just stuck in the station doing nothing. We need a mini game that lets us flip burgers in the station. At least that will get people thinking about the job of a fast food worker. I thought CCP would make casino games and go arcade eve. Imagine going to a casino station and gambling in texas holdem.

1 Like

I would love that.

They say they can’t because of different jurisdictions having laws against gambling.

They have hypernet.

Isn’t that gambling?

1 Like

Bullocks!
We don’t need no test server. We need dev’s to test their stuff before sending it for approval.
Test server :roll_eyes:

The test server was for carebears who are too scared to test things on the live server. They just want to ‘practice’ without any risk.

CCP made the right choice to get rid of it.

5 Likes

Says the most risk adverse player in the game.

averse /ə-vûrs′/

adjective

  1. Having a feeling of opposition, distaste, or aversion; strongly disinclined.

“investors who are averse to taking risks.”

  1. Turned away or backward.
  2. Having a repugnance or opposition of mind; disliking; disinclined; unwilling; reluctant.
    Similar: dislikingdisinclinedunwillingreluctant

Is your name “Smarter” ? Smarter than what, a seal?

1 Like

Smarter than the letter “U”, which is completely meaningless as a measure, might as well say smarter than a rock.

:smirk:

From you that’s a compliment.

:blush:

You.

Losing a 2m ISK Catalyst isn’t considered a risk little buddy.


Smarter Than @Uriel_the_Flame was taken. :rofl:

You mean I could have tested out my X-Large Ancillary Shield Booster, or rather accidentally hit it and not realised it was still on, and got a ’ you are out of capacitor ’ right at the gate of Kubinen…without having to flee when someone with 10,000 solo kills showed up ?

1 Like

I voted no, but it’s a qualified no in that I don’t think we need what the test server has been in the past: a general access playground for people to test fits and mess around in safety.

I do think we need a test server where expansion mechanics are deployed for targeted testing, analysis, and player feedback before they hit Tranquility. The current dev model seems to be “deploy to live and then patch, patch, patch until we get it right.” And I don’t think that is working well.

5 Likes

Same as it should be open only to the pilots who are in the CSM core group.

We might vote for our CSM members along with creating theads containing our suggestion though it is the CSM who send such information upwards.

Maybe in lieu of SiSi an actual “test group”?

1 Like

And yet, you voted “no”…

And yet, you didn’t read the rest of what I posted (apparently).