We need the test server.
- YES
- NO
0
voters
I am giving away a Marshall.
ReservedâŚ
1 Like
Could you add indifferent to the poll. Else Iâll have to pick both yes and no.
Mr Epeen 
2 Likes
Whatâs the point? Itâs not like it was shut down because ccp thought it wasnât popular
1 Like
Useless poll. CCP will do what CCP will do.
2 Likes
Didinât you say that youâve only been playing for 3 months?
2 Likes
Iâm leaning more yes than no, so Iâll go with that.
Mr Epeen
1 Like
Thatâs its usual way of playing forum. Itâll be gone soon. Till next character. As always.
Mr Epeen
1 Like
Should never have been taken away
2 Likes
I couldnât agree more.
An elite few still get to use itâŚ
*Eve Partners
1 Like
I voted âYesâ, but the problem is the rampant intelligence/advantage-seeking opportunists whoâve used SiSi to exploit others on Tranquility. Not sure how this is solvable. Do I get my Marshal?
2 Likes
For voting yes, or for providing CCP with more ammo?
I think Arthur is correct; it was exploitation by some folk among us which was responsible for CCPâs decision. It is certainly the most compelling reason from my point of view, though I suppose there may have been technical commitments from CCP itself which it wished quietly to discard.
The thing is, if Arthur is right, then perhaps there exists a way to make such exploitation impossible, or severely punishable, at least. If the effects of bad actors misbehaving on SiSi are transferred to TQ, they might have serious (and âexpensiveâ) consequences for the game.
Unfortunately, the ball is where it always has been - in CCPâs court. Has the CSM a view? Perhaps it could advocate on behalf of those wishing to see general access reinstated.
As regards the poll, Iâm not affected either way, so havenât voted.
4 Likes
On the other hand, if players could test out the changes in-advance - thereâs a certain segment of the playerbase that wouldnât be able to get their pitchforks and torches in order.
2 Likes
We feel that it should only be given to select few who contribute to the changes and support the CSM team
They remove all of the player structures from SiSi, or at least they used to.
When they deploy a new mirror, but dumbasses put them back up.
Then there was the rule of no non-consensual combat except at M-.
But people would start saying that rule was only enforced during mass testing and would go around destroying things while ppl would be testing fits
1 Like
CCP could just say, âNo Rulesâ.
Make it the way the game was intended, mostly.
And the alts come crawling out of the woodwork. I have never seen most of these voters post in here.
Mr Epeen
2 Likes