CCP screws everyone but big nullsec cartels

Nobody has argued these changes would invert the weak to suddenly be strong, nor is that an intent/issue of reducing systemic Player NS security/safety.

Im genuinely dissappointed in you.
Are you shilling, trolling or just dont get how badly you are contradicting yourself?

So what is the intent other than being a placebo effect?

Wat…

You think Delayed Local, no Asset Safety, no Insurance and limited Watchlist in Player NS will be a “placebo effect”?

A placebo effect, is when you are subjected to a non-active stimulus, as compared to an active one, in the belief you got the latter.

You are losing this badly, and wildly flailing for traction.

It has no meaning. It’s a meaningless change. When a change doesn’t change the overall balance among the players then it has no effect other than being a placebo effect.

Sure, it’s a change, just like a placebo pill is a pill you get to swallow (opposed to not swallowing anything), but it has no meaningful change.

Of course a placebo pill can make someone change their belief, like suddenly they feel better or more sick, when they should in fact feel no change.

Change however needs to be meaningful or it’s just a waste of time and money.

Perhaps explain what the meaning of your change is supposed to be. And please don’t say “it’s meant to make null-sec harder”. You don’t live in null-sec.

1 Like

Take the cigarette out of your face. I don’t watch your nicotine-induced rants. Use the forum and write it out like everyone else.

2 Likes

Didn’t watch it, just flagged it as spam. I’m not going to watch a video with the title “@ Whitehound”.

1 Like

Ofc not.

Its OC. (Original Content), the very opposite of spam.

So you arent going to watch OC that is directed, and addressed, specifically to you.

Ok.

If you have something to say, but cannot put it into simple writing then I’m not interested.

2 Likes

I did even better.

I made vids, especially for you, where I say it directly to you, with my own voice and face, simply.

1 Like

A proper argument for adjusting nullsec would take the following form:

  1. Link to CCP statements on nullsec design or at least a summary on the posters understanding of nullsec design.
  2. Arguments on where the design is failing.
  3. Proposed adjustments and how they would address the shortcomings (and in the ideal case also the likely drawbacks of said adjustments).

Instead we get “I don’t like it and therefore it must be nerfed in the following ways”, with the so-called solutions already having been discussed to death on the forum. The fact that CCP hasn’t implemented any of these solutions despite them being discussed for years in the forum is already a good indication of the overall quality of these ideas.

3 Likes

And always with a cigarette in your face. I cannot take you serious. Do you think of yourself as being serious?

Or, inversely, its an argument evidencing CCP coddling Player NS, for years.

Yes, Im quite serious.

Wtf does my smoke have to do with what Im saying?

Do you think some people that post here in text arent smoking while doing so?

It’s the nicotine. Doesn’t matter if it’s legal or illegal, alcohol or dope or nicotine. You keep shoving the stick into your face and you talk while exhaling like any other addict before you.

I cannot help you with it, but I won’t watch your videos while you smoke and at the same time try to make sense of your thoughts.

Wow.

So now Im wrong, cos Im nicotine addled.

Amazing…

Gimme a minute, Ill make a new vid reply with no cigarette, so we can put this ■■■■ to rest.

No. You’re wrong, because you cannot put it into writing like everyone else.

image

6 Likes

I put it all in writing, many times, above.