CODE - can anyone can explain?

It means there are even more lazy miners and freighter pilots skill injecting into ships they have no business flying, while carrying multiple billions in cargo than ever before…

1 Like

Suicide ganking is increasingly cock-blocking changes to wardec and HS aggression mechanics.

1 Like

Ganking is still a niche content

It’s not for everyone,
It’s not as easy as people seem to think it is,
It’s definitely not a mainstream activity,

Its not like ratting or mining

3 Likes

Its actually My thread, so i read it.
I linked the stats pages, where you have the estimated ISK destroyed.

Read Links.

2 Likes

This refers to suicide ganking, not ganking.

At 2.6trillion destroyed in 04.2018, this is no longer niche.

1 Like

There are a lot of other Alliances which kill far more stuff. Should CCP step in and regulate them as well? Or is this some kind of “Highsec is speshul and not a sandbox”-thing?

Once again it just shows how much you don’t understand this game.

7 Likes

Stop shitting up this thread, this was already brought up in another thread, and answered.

If you can’t face the truth it’s not of my concern.
The stats are there, ganking is still a niche content.

Period.

4 Likes

2.67 trillion isk vs 50bil lost from one org involved specifically in HS suicide ganking, in one month, is no longer niche/fringe.

They lost only 1.9% compared to what they destroyed.

1 Like

denoting or relating to products, services, or interests that appeal to a small, specialized section of the population.

By definition ganking is a niche content.
Can someone call moderators so that we can have a conversation uninterrupted by this guy?

1 Like

You can do it yourself, but false reports are frowned upon.

CODE lost only 50billion vs 2.6trillion destroyed in 04.2018, via suicide ganking.

The only “niche” here, is the tiny 1.8% loss, even though CONCORD is guaranteed to destroy all suicide gankers.

1 Like

@Dave_Argon you might want to call the cleanup crew…

We have a broken bot in aisle 5

1 Like

This is not “niche”:

2 Likes

Once again

Niche

denoting or relating to products, services, or interests that appeal to a small, specialized section of the population.

Is reading that hard?
Are you saying that the definition of the word Niche is wrong?

:facepalm:

1 Like

ROFL. This is news to me. Had this nonsense been brought up by somone else before or is this another Salvos thing?

CODE suicide ganking is clearly no longer a “niche”, as per the definition of the word or its context in EVE.

You can take that up with the wardec/merc community.

1 Like

So what?

1 Like

So it might be time for CCP to investigate/re-valuate suicide gank mechanics that make possible for CODE, with only 585 members in 04.2018:

  • Loss of only 50bil vs 2.67 trillion
  • 6.5k kills vs only 3.6 losses (rounded up)
  • Losing only 1.8%, compared to suicide gank targets.
  • A consistent ~95% efficiency rate.
4 Likes

Why should they do that? It is a sandbox

7 Likes

He obviously hates you guys for killing more in a month than he would in a lifetime, and for making so much isk off of people being dumb hahahahaha

CCP should, by his logic, buff the hp of all haulers, pods, mining barges, give hp bonuses for citadels that keep getting killed, remove low power for the latter. As well as putting instant concord reaction force.
/s

2 Likes

Time for CCP to investigate/re-valuate suicide gank mechanics that make possible for CODE, with only 585 members in 04.2018:

  • Loss of only 50bil vs 2.67 trillion
  • 6.5k kills vs only 3.6 losses (rounded up)
  • Losing only 1.8%, compared to suicide gank targets.
  • A consistent ~95% efficiency rate.

CODE aren’t the only people in the sandbox.

4 Likes