That would be a possibility if there was more than one route from Amarr to Jita via high security space, alas just dodging its another disingenuous response and weak attempt at gaslighting the problem.
The argument is not against the loss, removal of security status tags only changes the cost of the consequences.
Did not say that either.
Nothing about removing security status tags changes the ISK metrics, only the time spent managing the security status loss.
Yes, this.
Is there no optometrists ?
Insufficient buffer, mechanics that punish logi.
Try ganking in a starter system and see how long that lasts before an account ban hits.
Explain SRP then?
Rubbish, the enemy have a ship scan of your fit fast than it can jump a gate.
So those empty rookie ships getting blown up by bored catalyst pilots just needed to fit a larger shield extender and they would be ok huh?
Is blowing up empty rookie ships a sustainable activity for gankers?
I know being disingenuous is sort of your thing that you do, but pretending that there is some scale problem with rookie ships getting ganked is uniquely laughable.
The problem is for low sec pirates, i.e. people who live in lowsec and PvP, if they get wardecced by a highsec corp and can’t tag up to be able to attack a highsec structure they have a much longer grind ratting to sec up than the highsec gankers ever do.
So removing tags won’t change highsec ganking but will make wardeccing lowsec pirates OP.
Not what was said, only countering the assertion a well fit ship results in a safer outcome, as for some ships, there is no safe fit and for some gankers, they attack on ‘principle’ and not profit.
What gankers or low sec pirates care for war declarations by people in high sec? If the high security corp comes to low sec, one would say they are not a high security space corporation anymore.
It is a possibility because there are multiple HS routes from Jita to Amarr and back at each given moment. HS to HS whs exist, eve-scout exist.
And besides that, the game has absolutely zero obligation to even offer a freely accessible HS route at all times. Delaying your trip or trying routes via Pochven, Wormholes or Lowsec are a completely viable option. It isn’t like your ship magically explodes the moment you leave HS. Maneuvering out of HS is also a thing that can be learned, easily.
You are SO right - why should you have to dodge anything? You should be able to do what you want, when you want, where you want, how you want - and you shouldn’t ever have to deviate in any way, or take into account anything other than your own interest. Is that right?
You know that are some safe routes, including LowSec, that don’t take 50+ Jumps? Just because you have to visit a LowSec doesn’t mean you get instant blown up.
Did this route more then once, scouted some BS and Hauler throu that systems and never lost one ship.
Dodging a threat you can’t engage head to head is simply using the tactical options the game offers.
In any other game that wouldn’t even be a discussion.
If you encounter a damn Level 97 Firedragon in an RPG with your level 32 casual melee warrior you don’t go let your self be toasted a 100 times and then complain to the game developer that there is “a problem”.
If your opponents holds a chokepoint in Starcraft with bunkers and tanks you don’t run your army into it trying to storm the fortress and complaining afterwards if everything dies.
If you try to get to your Loadout in Call of Duty Warzone and the location is camped by a whole squad of max. equipped tryhards and you have only your pistol, you don’t die trying and cry to the Devs afterwards.
If the threat level is too high, you reevaluate your options. That is called gameplay.
it seems to me pal that it is only YOUR interest and views that matters here. Anything that does not go down your street is met with sarcasm and stupid responses. Kindly up your maturity level a bit. it will be appreciated
No it was directed exactly at who it needed to go to. Elena Token’s responses are mature, without sarcasm, no toxicity and lifts valid points and arguments. @Aiko Danuja is just childish, immature and a general pest who needs to take his flame and childishness somewhere else. His inputs hold no credit other than deliberate little angry syndrome issues which he like to spit at others trying to debate on a centralized issue. There is no place for adults with 10 year old attitudes here…
So you’re picking Aiko, who is making legitimate points and counter-arguments that highlight all the errors and mistakes of @Eloken_Toralen when he he is making non-sense arguments and essentially just wants to remove ganking without saying it out loud? How does that make sense in your head?
Ther eis a lervel of response that gioverns a bit of maturity during discussions. No the toxic flame that is being experienced. There is fart better ways of wording things in a situation where something is discussed and unfoirtunatelky with regards to that player that is non existant. I fully accepts arguments from all, no problem, but i cannot agree with the childish nature and sarcasm expressed in that player’s posts. do it properly or go away. simple