I was reviewing the platforms of the CSM 17 results: Welcome to CSM17! | EVE Online
Congrats to all the candidates for their efforts, successful and otherwise. It’s good to see so many players invested in making EVE better for everyone.
A quick summary of the elected (please forgive the too-brief notes on their focus):
Goons:
Angry Mustache - Null, economy, improving gameplay mechanics
Kazanir - Null, EVE & CCP’s economy
Initiative.:
Brisc Rubal - Null, PvP, economy
Pandoralica - Null, PvP content creation
Pandemic:
Kenneth Feld - Null, industry, economy, QoL
Storm Delay - Null, conflict drivers
Brave: Jinx De’caire - New players
Fraternity: Luke Anninan - Null wars, sovereignty
Non-Null:
Mark Resurrectus - WH life
Arsia Elkin - FW, low-sec, small group, lore content
It’s a good set of candidates. I also urge any non-elected candidates to continue to make their issues and concerns known, in forums or through the elected CSM. Many important issues were brought up this year and CCP needs to remain aware of those.
Reviewing their platform posts, I noticed just how many CSM candidates placed “repairing the economy” as a major focus.
Comparing with previous year results, a good recent summary from 2021 is here:
I note that the number of subscribers casting votes in this years CSM is down substantially, in the 20% range. That’s a pretty hefty decline.
Subbed players either can’t be bothered to vote, are subbing fewer alts, or have simply left EVE. None of these are good trends.
With any luck, perhaps this year CCP will choose to consult a little more carefully with the CSM and the player base as a whole.