Its a restriction, not a quota.
Two different terms.
It restricts the amount of CSM seats a Corp/Alliance can have to one.
It adds no quota to the CSM panel itself, which is still made up of 10 members, whom are elected by majority.
1 seated CSM member per Corp/Alliance is fair, as it is applied to all Corps/Alliances in EVE.
Its a restriction placed on Corps/Alliances, and membership in them of more than 1 CSM.
Its not a quota, in any shape or form, in regards to the CSM panel itself.
CSM is not intended as a political meta battleground.
Its intended as a representational group of elected players whom are intermediaries/advisors between CCP and the wider playerbase.
CSM are also contractually held to a higher standard than other players.
Corp/Alliance action to try to dominate the CSM is counter-productive.
With a max 1 CSM per Corp/Alliance flag restriction, CSM representation can diversify without political complications.
If 2 candidates want to run under the same flag, only the one with most votes gains a seat on CSM, if they have enough vs all other candidates in EVE to get a CSM seat.
Aside from that, they are free to run on any toon they want, in any Corp/Alliance they want, and that character will become the official CSM rep, with which all CSM business is to be conducted.
Your really are devoted to the art of BS arent you Lucas? And you STILL havenât addressed the evidence.
âIts not that wayâ ⌠actually evidence.
âHeâs not just representing 0.0â ⌠actually evidence.
He said it in this very thread. And the âBalance passâ lol or have you not actually read it? Also you said âYouâre right, the null agenda is pushedâ⌠So yes, evidence. (You also said âThe makeup of the CSM doesnât mean itâs inherently weighted to nullâ so which is it?)
âI dont have mastersâ ⌠evidence, youâre sure acting like u do.
âIts working fineâ ⌠evidence, thousands of disenfranchised voters whoâs votes arent worth shite.
âThats an attackâŚâ ⌠evidence, âattackâ is your word not mine. Also âhateâ was mentionedâŚ??? Or did u forget that you accused me of that?
âThats not what i said at allâŚâ ⌠evidence, thats EXACTLY what you said⌠quote âso we can pretty much go ahead and ignore any other opinion you have on the matterâ end quote.
âYouâre angryâŚâ no i think youâre funny and deluded.
You just dont get it. Screw those blinkers on tighter man!! Tighter!!! The truth might actually get inâŚ
Leaks happen all the time.
Often inadvertently.
Some people unwittingly give away information by omission or smart cross-questioning. They wont even know it happened.
It also needs more than âGuys all of you vote for this guyâ and âYou guys in there vote for that guy.â âThe rest of you vote for meâ
Tadaaaaa CSM 13!!!
You really dont think thats messed up? That thats not every bit as sad as people like me who are so disillusioned with the system that they now opt out?
@everyone with the exception of #### i want to see every single corp mate inside fleet right NOW @#### @#### if you arenât in a fax under seb you put yourself in Muninns. Every alt, doesnât matter if its a sceptor
On a scale of 1 to wrangling rate this ns ping plz