Hey, I wasn’t being serious. I’ve had talks with Jennifer in the past. She’s a dislexic. Sure, that excuse is thrown around a lot, but she seems pretty legit. I think I throw something at her every time I see her post, because it’s just so ■■■■■■■ annoying. 
HEY, UNFAIR, this was the closest I could get to my old name! 
It’s the german word for Project. 
Well … I don’t know! In a sense it is, because one does not require alts at all. It could just be actual friends. When your target audience is isolationist farmers though, then there’s a problem.
I think it’s a bad example to use supers. Supers aren’t even meant for soloplay. Any outsider hearing that he needs an alt to fly a super isn’t going to last anyway, because he’d be using it solo … and losing it. Unless he joins an alliance, where he gets to afford an alt easily anyway.
I think the real question is: Does it hurt the game that there still exist barriers keeping out certain types of people? No, I don’t think so. Does it hurt the game that people believe one requires an alt? Yeah. Is it the actual truth though? No.
So, do we actually want people, who believe something wrong, in the game? The forums showed us that those who complain about it usually can’t be educated, thus showing that it’s not actually a loss when they don’t play.
Just like all those casuals who claim they need special protection because they can’t invest the time. Then some asshole claims that we need more players, where I throw in that quality matters more than quantity, after which he exposes that he’s too ■■■■■■■ dumb to understand what that even means.
Hell … I don’t know. It’s too complex for me to analyse and I’m just drinking tea.
No coffee yet. 