DIAGNOSTIC & SOLUTIONS : Letter to CCP

Seems you are not very good to catch what was implied. Why would CCP ask to post it there if not to see how the player base reacts to it?

1 Like

Can you please post about OP content? Also ask those to CCP not me.

I’m posting about the Op content. The poor presentation of your idea is somewhere else too?

No you havent say any single word about researcss, biases, applications, policies or any components of the OP

I said it looks like a personal crusade of you that you want to make into a bigger crusade involving the whole player base. And I said I prefer to not see this kind of thing going forward.
For some reason you don’t like it.
Yet, you fail to convince me that it is anything but a personal crusade, and try to demand that i go through all this “research” before I can’t even say if I like what it looks like.
Well, that is not how things work.
You proposal, make it attractive or it will not go forward.

Comment about OP content please . If you could understand it

Ad hominem

1 Like

No. They didnt know about the content even. This is CCP s standart answer.

So what is your solution

No it is not. There is nobody in the world capable to understand everything. If someone tell me if you can understand these equations please calculate. I say i cant … not my special… but i dont feel offended. Did you understand ? I dont think it is ad hominem. Do you ? Or you all mighty and capable for everything all knowing ?

What do you think about these economic behavioral concepts reflection in EvE ?

It’s up to you to clarify to me why the OP represents a good idea. Not to me go into the detail of why it don’t convince me.
So far the only thing you did is trying to appeal to my emotions. HINT: not working.

Please comment about OP s content. What is your question ? Which part ?

If someone tells me if you add three ficklebits into a mobum xieliquick, how many floorbusts do you have, I’m gonna tell him I don’t understand, because those words do not exist in the English language.

1 Like

Condensed version.

All of it.

1 Like

Tell me about how sunk cost fallacy effects status quo bias and reflection on mental account . Enter.

For starts, what is the problem if some people leaving EVE after experimenting it? What is fundamentally wrong with EVE appealing to people with a particular mindset and not to people with a different particular mindset?

All psychology philosophy you can find english read understand what you read you can understand english doesnt mean you are fully operational philosopher or psych. Right?

In what situation? In what regards? You can’t just string words together without context and expect to start a conversation.

This is not the answer i give the equations parts asked the spesific detrimental result . It is connected to what i write up there directly and i mention it

And again it is a good question also .According to CCP women doesnt like eve so much because women doesnt like sci fi so much … this is some kind of perspective. You can evaluate things and find reasons inside and outside. If you find a reason from outside and if that reason is seem like something you cannot change then stop searching for the reasons . Accept the situation do nothing about it … familiar?

Yes CCP doesnt do anything about it… only twist fact is women also likes sci fi . What do we have in our hands ? A result of perspective and evaluation .